Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add swarm-ai-research/swarm --skill paper-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swarm-ai-research/swarmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swarm-ai-research/swarm/paper-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swarm-ai-research/swarm/paper-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swarm-ai-research/swarm/paper-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swarm-ai-research/swarm/paper-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swarm-ai-research/swarm/paper-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01089 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00544 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
paper-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Paper Writing Skill
Generate a markdown research paper pre-populated with methods tables, results tables, and figure references from SWARM experiment data.
Prerequisites
sqlite3(Python stdlib) for reading runs databasepandas>=2.0for data manipulation- Experiment data in SQLite database or CSV files
Procedure
1. Query the runs database
import sqlite3
import pandas as pd
def load_runs(db_path, scenario_ids=None):
"""Load scenario runs from SQLite database."""
conn = sqlite3.connect(db_path)
if scenario_ids:
placeholders = ",".join("?" * len(scenario_ids))
query = f"SELECT * FROM scenario_runs WHERE scenario_id IN ({placeholders})"
df = pd.read_sql_query(query, conn, params=scenario_ids)
else:
df = pd.read_sql_query("SELECT * FROM scenario_runs", conn)
conn.close()
return df
2. Build the methods table
def build_methods_table(df):
"""Generate a markdown table of experimental scenarios."""
scenarios = df.groupby("scenario_id").first().reset_index()
lines = ["| Scenario | Agents | Governance | Seeds | Epochs |",
"|----------|--------|-----------|-------|--------|"]
for _, row in scenarios.iterrows():
lines.append(
f"| {row['scenario_id']} | {row.get('n_agents', 'N/A')} | "
f"{row.get('governance_desc', 'default')} | "
f"{row.get('n_seeds', 'N/A')} | {row.get('n_epochs', 'N/A')} |"
)
return "\n".join(lines)
3. Build the results table
def build_results_table(df):
"""Generate a cross-scenario summary results table."""
summary = df.groupby("scenario_id").agg({
"welfare": ["mean", "std"],
"toxicity_rate": ["mean", "std"],
"quality_gap": ["mean", "std"],
}).reset_index()
lines = ["| Scenario | Welfare (mean±std) | Toxicity (mean±std) | Quality Gap (mean±std) |",
"|----------|-------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|"]
for _, row in summary.iterrows():
lines.append(
f"| {row[('scenario_id', '')]} | "
f"{row[('welfare', 'mean')]:.3f}±{row[('welfare', 'std')]:.3f} | "
f"{row[('toxicity_rate', 'mean')]:.3f}±{row[('toxicity_rate', 'std')]:.3f} | "
f"{row[('quality_gap', 'mean')]:.3f}±{row[('quality_gap', 'std')]:.3f} |"
)
return "\n".join(lines)
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 147 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 4f13d1820513
paper-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository swarm-ai-research/swarm (42 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,089 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsmm-builder
Build or load a genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM) using COBRApy. Covers loading from BIGG, constructing minimal models from scratch, setting medium constraints, and exporting validated .json model files.
stat-result-validator
Validate statistical research outputs for formulation quality, method-to- problem alignment, theory presence, experimental evidence, fair comparison, artifact completeness, and final-claim consistency.
meta-analysis
Statistical methods for combining results across multiple studies. Use when aggregating cross-study or cross-experiment results.
mixed-precision
Use FP16/BF16 mixed precision to accelerate training and reduce memory. Use when optimizing GPU performance.
aclawdemy
The academic research platform for AI agents. Submit papers, review research, build consensus, and push toward AGI — together.
adme-property-predictor
Predict ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion) properties for drug candidates using cheminformatics models and molecular descriptors. Evaluates drug-likeness, bioavailability, and pharmacokinetic profile to guide lead optimization and candidate selection in drug discovery.