Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/plugin install vbwWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00392 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00157 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/vbw" show requirements 2>&1 || true
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/vbw" interview 2>&1 || true
Write to the user's level, explanation depth and involvement (above; "-": plain words).
The requirements to check are the [human, open] or [human, rejected] ones
marked built above. None: say what is still being built and stop.
For each one, one at a time: show the user the thing to judge. Run it yourself
when you can (the program's actual output, the page's text) and put that, or
one concrete thing to try, in the question and the preview of "Works".
Something visual: if you can open it (a browser tool), save a screenshot in
.vbw/runtime/ and open it for the user (open, xdg-open); otherwise give
the exact way to see it. Ask with
AskUserQuestion: "Works", "Something's wrong", "Skip for now".
- Works:
vbw req accept <id>. - Something's wrong: ask what, in their words, then
vbw req reject <id> "<their words>"(VBW fixes it and asks again). - Skip for now:
vbw req skip <id>(it stays open;/vbw:vibeoffers to ship and judge it in the next milestone).
Close with what was accepted and what goes back for fixing; /vbw:vibe continues.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 31 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 2259a13747ff
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw (85 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 392 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-22.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.