Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to synaptic-ai-consulting/AAMAD. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/synaptic-ai-consulting/AAMAD/main/.cursor/skills/verify-change/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/synaptic-ai-consulting/AAMADWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/synaptic-ai-consulting/aamad/verify-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/synaptic-ai-consulting/aamad/verify-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/synaptic-ai-consulting/aamad/verify-change/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/synaptic-ai-consulting/aamad/verify-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/synaptic-ai-consulting/aamad/verify-change.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00655 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
verify-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Change
Record that the current change set is understood and checked before Deliver. Owned by @qa.eng; invoked as *verify-change. Write the checklist into project-context/2.build/qa.md (section Verification checklist). Do not invent a second QA artifact.
This is not a replacement for *test-unit, *test-integration, *test-visual, *run-evals, or .cursor/skills/product-design/SKILL.md.
Step 1: Load context
Read:
project-context/1.define/prd.md,sad.md,user-stories/*.md,system-description.md(if present)project-context/2.build/qa.md,frontend.md,backend.md,integration.mdproject-context/2.build/ux-review.mdandproject-context/1.define/ux.mdwhen UI changedaamad.config.yml(quality.require_verification_checklist,crew.autonomy)
Step 2: Collect the change set
List the files and behaviors this increment shipped. Map each behavior to an acceptance-criteria ID (AC-*) when one exists.
Step 3: Fill the checklist
For the increment, record pass / fail / not applicable with a one-line note:
| Check | Result | AC-* | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Correctness — unit | |||
| Correctness — integration / smoke | |||
| Security — no new secrets; tools stay on the SAD allowlist | |||
| Maintainability — change stays inside MVP and the recorded pattern | |||
| Author explanation — what shipped and why it is safe to release |
Rules:
- The author (persona that made the change, summarized here by QA) must explain what shipped in the Author explanation row. A passing test suite is not that explanation.
- When UI changed, cite
ux-review.mdin the note. Do not repeat Shape / Implement / Review / Harden and do not treat a matching visual snapshot as proof the design is good. - When the Pattern Decision includes a model call, cite
evals.mdstatus. Do not re-run the eval design here. - Fail the checklist if an agent loop, live-state retrieval, or a side-effecting tool appeared that the SAD did not allow.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 50 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 15aac8f588e6
verify-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository synaptic-ai-consulting/AAMAD (88 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 655 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.