Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SynkraAI/aiox-core --skill qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SynkraAI/aiox-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/synkraai/aiox-core/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/synkraai/aiox-core/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/synkraai/aiox-core/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/synkraai/aiox-core/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/synkraai/aiox-core/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Rogue Agent · line 138 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.04880 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01952 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00976 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00488 |
Grade A, and why
aiox-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 467 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A ce64b9e08d98
aiox-qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository SynkraAI/aiox-core (3,130 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 4,880 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hatch3r-feature
End-to-end feature implementation workflow. Covers data model, domain logic, API, and UI as a vertical slice. Use when implementing new features or working on feature request issues.
hatch3r-bug-fix
Step-by-step bug fix workflow. Diagnose root cause, implement minimal fix, write regression test. Use when fixing bugs, working on bug report issues, or when the user mentions a bug.
hatch3r-qa-validation
E2E validation workflow producing a structured pass/fail report with evidence. Use when running QA validation, acceptance testing, verifying releases, or working on QA E2E validation issues.
hatch3r-refactor
Internal code quality improvement workflow without changing external behavior. Use when refactoring code structure, simplifying modules, or improving maintainability.
swarm-advanced
Advanced swarm orchestration patterns for research, development, testing, and complex distributed workflows.
swarm-advanced
Advanced swarm orchestration patterns for research, development, testing, and complex distributed workflows.