Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add T4wroot/agentic-seo --skill tab-accordiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/T4wroot/agentic-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/tab-accordion)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/tab-accordion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/tab-accordion/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/tab-accordion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/tab-accordion.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.01983 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00992 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00397 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
tab-accordion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to tab-accordion — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Components: Tab & Accordion
Guides tab and accordion implementation for organizing content without excessive vertical space. Two layout patterns: vertical accordion (FAQ-style, stacked) and horizontal tabs (how-to style, side-by-side). Both improve UX by reducing scroll; SEO impact depends on implementation and content placement.
When invoking: On first use, if helpful, open with 1–2 sentences on what this skill covers and why it matters, then provide the main output. On subsequent use or when the user asks to skip, go directly to the main output.
Layout Patterns
| Pattern | Layout | Best for | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vertical accordion | Stacked; expand/collapse one at a time | FAQ, Q&A, long lists, objection handling | "How do I return?" → answer below |
| Horizontal tabs | Side-by-side labels; one panel visible | How-to steps, product specs, pricing tiers, comparisons | "Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3" or short action labels (see howto-section-generator—labels should match H2 intent, not contradict a fixed “N steps” title) |
Mobile: Vertical accordion works well on small screens (natural scroll). Horizontal tabs can feel cramped—consider accordion, dropdown, or full-width tab bar that scrolls.
SEO: Is It Friendly?
Google's position: Google indexes and ranks content inside tabs and accordions fully; hidden content receives full weight (confirmed since 2016 mobile-first indexing). Gary Illyes: "we index the content, its weight is fully considered for ranking."
Practical nuance: Some tests show always-visible content outperforms hidden content in rankings. Reserve tabs/accordions for secondary content; place primary, keyword-critical content in visible areas.
| Content type | Placement |
|---|---|
| Primary / ranking-focused | Visible above fold; not hidden |
| Secondary / supporting | Tabs, accordions acceptable |
| FAQ answers | Accordion OK; first item expanded by default; see faq-page-generator |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 143 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 9a154b4d7c61
tab-accordion is a skill published in the GitHub repository T4wroot/agentic-seo (15 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 1,983 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to tab-accordion, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
fire-your-seo-agency
A procedure for improving how a website appears in search engines and how AI answer systems find and cite it. It covers search, answer-engine, generative-AI, and Naver visibility.
improve-aeo-geo
Audits a website codebase and makes code changes so AI engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews) can better discover, parse, quote, and cite the site. Covers structured data, content structure, technical signals, and freshness.
build-resource-pages
Takes existing content markdown files and builds production-final resource center pages on client websites using their existing tech stack and design system. Output is live-ready — no review pass, no placeholder content, no prototype styling. Implements hub pages, section listings, article pages, and cross-linking for…
seo-ai-site-builders
Turn a JavaScript-only site built by an AI website generator into indexable HTML. Input: a site made with Lovable, Base44, Bolt, v0, Replit, Firebase Studio, Framer, Wix, Durable, Softr, Bubble, Glide or any similar tool. Output: proof of what crawlers actually receive (bundled zero-dependency script), the right…
content-thicken
Evidence-driven blog driver. Takes ONE target from the fused search plus AI-answer content library, pulls the real questions it has to answer, drafts a thick long-form guide against a template contract, validates it deterministically, and stops at preview. Two modes, thicken an already-earning post IN PLACE (never…
backlink-outreach
Find, evaluate, pitch and track natural backlink and content partnerships. Prospects come from the GEO citation data rather than a generic blog search: the targets are the pages an AI already cites when answering your category questions. Research runs on the Monid tool layer (web search and scrape, authority metrics…