Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tabtab-ai/skill-flow/deep-reading-analystnpx skills add tabtab-ai/skill-flow --skill deep-reading-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tabtab-ai/skill-flowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tabtab-ai/skill-flow/deep-reading-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tabtab-ai/skill-flow/deep-reading-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tabtab-ai/skill-flow/deep-reading-analyst.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00225 | $0.03673 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00112 | $0.01836 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00735 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00367 |
Grade A, and why
deep-reading-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to deep-reading-analyst — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 505 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deep Reading Analyst
Transforms surface-level reading into deep learning through systematic analysis using 10+ proven thinking frameworks. Guides users from understanding to application through structured workflows.
Framework Arsenal
Quick Analysis (15min)
- 📋 SCQA - Structure thinking (Situation-Complication-Question-Answer)
- 🔍 5W2H - Completeness check (What, Why, Who, When, Where, How, How much)
Standard Analysis (30min)
- 🎯 Critical Thinking - Argument evaluation
- 🔄 Inversion Thinking - Risk identification
Deep Analysis (60min)
- 🧠 Mental Models - Multi-perspective analysis (physics, biology, psychology, economics)
- ⚡ First Principles - Essence extraction
- 🔗 Systems Thinking - Relationship mapping
- 🎨 Six Thinking Hats - Structured creativity
Research Analysis (120min+)
- 📊 Cross-Source Comparison - Multi-article synthesis
Workflow Decision Tree
User provides content
↓
Ask: Purpose + Depth Level + Preferred Frameworks
↓
┌─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┐
│ Level 1 │ Level 2 │ Level 3 │ Level 4 │
│ Quick │ Standard │ Deep │ Research │
│ 15min │ 30min │ 60min │ 120min+ │
├─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┤
│ • SCQA │ Level 1 + │ Level 2 + │ Level 3 + │
│ • 5W2H │ • Critical │ • Mental Models │ • Cross-source │
│ • Structure │ • Inversion │ • First Princ. │ • Web search │
│ │ │ • Systems │ • Synthesis │
│ │ │ • Six Hats │ │
└─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┘
Step 1: Initialize Analysis
Ask User (conversationally):
- "What's your main goal for reading this?"
- Problem-solving / Learning / Writing / Decision-making / Curiosity
- "How deep do you want to go?"
- Quick (15min) / Standard (30min) / Deep (60min) / Research (120min+)
- "Any specific frameworks you'd like to use?"
- Suggest based on content type (see Framework Selection Guide below)
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 505 lines · 225 tokens per session scan A 2850738bb624
deep-reading-analyst is a skill published in the GitHub repository tabtab-ai/skill-flow (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 225 tokens to every session and 3,673 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to deep-reading-analyst, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
edu-math-tutorial
数学题分步讲解视频的领域知识。适用场景：(1) 用户给出一道数学题并要求做讲解/ 解题视频；(2) 用户说"讲解这道题"、"生成解题视频"、"make a math tutorial"； (3) 需要中文数学教学视频，涉及方程、公式或几何图形。本 skill 只提供领域 知识（题目拆解、讲解节奏、旁白文案规范、版式与 KaTeX 排版风格）；画面、 配音与成片一律用 Creator 原生 Element 与工具从源头构建。.
offensive-vuln-classes
Exploit development curriculum covering core vulnerability classes with real-world CVE case studies: stack/heap buffer overflows, use-after-free, integer overflows, format strings, type confusion, and race conditions. Use when learning or teaching vuln classes, researching specific CVE patterns, or building exploit…
scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review…
offensive-osint-methodology
Structured OSINT methodology framework: target definition, source selection, collection workflows, data correlation, timeline reconstruction, and reporting. Use to guide systematic OSINT campaigns or teach OSINT methodology.
practice-cognition
触发：当你提出了方案、假设或判断，需要通过实践验证、试错迭代或复盘升级认知时调用；常见信号包括 experiment、prototype、validate、iterate、feedback loop。 English: Trigger when an idea, hypothesis, or plan must be tested in practice and improved through iteration. Use this skill to move from action to understanding and back to action in a spiral learning loop.
offensive-exploit-dev-course
Full exploit development course roadmap and syllabus: weekly topics, recommended reading, lab setup, and learning path from vulnerability classes through advanced exploitation. Use to structure exploit dev training or onboard new researchers.