tabularis: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/tabularis-pr-review/SKILL.md

tabularis-pr-review is a skill for Claude Code from TabularisDB/tabularis. It costs 90 tokens per session (1,387 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A local review process for Tabularis pull requests, which are proposed code changes shared for review. It reads the repository's own rules, checks whether the pull request's claims match the code, runs its tests on the proposed branch, and prepares real-data checks for a person to perform.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing a Tabularis pull request to inspect the full change, apply relevant rules, verify behavior, and produce a copy-ready manual test plan.
Why use it?
It replaces a quick diff glance with evidence about code quality, stated behavior, test results, and manual verification needs.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

This is TabularisDB/tabularis's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on tabularis itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything tabularis configures →

About the project

Tabularis is an open-source desktop application for connecting to and working with databases through SQL, including PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, SQLite, DuckDB, ClickHouse, Redis and Firestore. It is used for database exploration, querying, SQL notebooks and visual query-plan analysis, and includes an MCP server that lets Claude, Cursor and Devin access schemas and run queries.

TabularisDB/tabularis · 4,799 stars · on GitHub · tabularis.dev

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to TabularisDB/tabularis. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TabularisDB/tabularis/main/.claude/skills/tabularis-pr-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TabularisDB/tabularis

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for tabularis-pr-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tabularisdb/tabularis/tabularis-pr-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tabularisdb/tabularis/tabularis-pr-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tabularisdb/tabularis/tabularis-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tabularisdb/tabularis/tabularis-pr-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 90 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,387 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00090 $0.01387
Opus 5 $0.00045 $0.00694
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00277
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00139

Measured 8d ago against content hash ab3336e078f7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

tabularis-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/tabularis-pr-review/SKILL.md · 85 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Tabularis Local PR Review

Overview

A read-everything-then-verify review for Tabularis PRs. Goes beyond a diff skim: judges the diff against the repo's own .rules/, confirms the PR's stated claims are true, runs the PR's tests on the PR branch, and stages real data so the human can manually exercise the change. The deliverable is a review plus a copy-paste test plan, not just opinions.

Core principle: Don't trust the PR description — verify every claim against the code, then prove the behavior with real data.

Workflow

Work top to bottom. Each step feeds the next.

1. Pull the PR

gh pr view <N> --json title,body,author,baseRefName,headRefName,state,additions,deletions,changedFiles,labels
gh pr diff <N> --name-only      # scope
gh pr diff <N>                  # full diff

2. Load the rules you'll judge against

Read .rules/*.md for every changed file's domain before forming opinions. The common offenders:

  • react.md #2setState called synchronously in useEffect (async-after-await is fine). Very common in modal/form PRs.
  • react.md #1 — exhaustive useEffect/useMemo/useCallback deps.
  • typescript.md — no any.
  • rust.md — pure helpers extracted + unit-tested; mod.rs stays orchestration-only; public APIs re-exported on refactor.
  • general.md — English-only comments; new user-facing strings need i18n keys in src/i18n/locales/*.

3. Verify the PR's claims — don't take them on faith

For each factual assertion in the description, prove it:

  • "Uses common.search / common.noResults i18n keys" → grep '"search"\|"noResults"' src/i18n/locales/en.json.
  • "Removing searchable={false} enables search" → read the component default (grep searchable src/components/ui/Select.tsx).
  • "Reads default_port from the manifest" → check the type (src/types/plugins.ts) — is it nullable? What's the fallback?
  • New Tauri command → confirm it's registered in src-tauri/src/lib.rs invoke_handler.

Read the full file on GitHub · 85 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 85 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A ab3336e078f7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

tabularis-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository TabularisDB/tabularis (4,799 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 1,387 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

gonavi-cli

Operate databases through the GoNavi headless CLI — the gonavi executable shipped in verified GitHub Release archives. Covers listing/adding/importing saved connections, running SQL queries against saved connections or ad-hoc connection files, exporting result sets to csv/json/md/html/xlsx, batch-executing SQL files…

Syngnat/GoNavi · 144 tokens

code-review

Comprehensive code review assistant that analyzes code quality, security, and best practices.

ThinkInAIXYZ/deepchat · 18 tokens

trellis-check

Comprehensive quality verification: spec compliance, lint, type-check, tests, cross-layer data flow, code reuse, and consistency checks. Use when code is written and needs quality verification, before committing changes, or to catch context drift during long sessions.

fy-agent/fyagent · 54 tokens

codex-bridge

A workflow for asking the Codex command-line tool to review a plan, implement approved code changes, revise an implementation, or check findings. The command-line tool is a separate coding-agent interface that can work in controlled read-only or workspace-writing modes.

bahayonghang/my-ai-cli-toolkit · 102 tokens

readmd-code-review

Use when code blocks in a Markdown document need a security, correctness, and maintainability review.

Natsummerance/readMD · 24 tokens

persona-review

A format for writing short pull-request review comments, with each comment naming the location, problem, fix, and severity. A pull request is a proposed code change for review.

atman-33/workhub · 47 tokens