Tabularis is an open-source desktop application for connecting to and working with databases through SQL, including PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, SQLite, DuckDB, ClickHouse, Redis and Firestore. It is used for database exploration, querying, SQL notebooks and visual query-plan analysis, and includes an MCP server that lets Claude, Cursor and Devin access schemas and run queries.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TabularisDB/tabularis. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TabularisDB/tabularis/main/.claude/skills/tabularis-pr-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TabularisDB/tabularisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tabularisdb/tabularis/tabularis-pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tabularisdb/tabularis/tabularis-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tabularisdb/tabularis/tabularis-pr-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.01387 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00694 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00277 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
tabularis-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Tabularis Local PR Review
Overview
A read-everything-then-verify review for Tabularis PRs. Goes beyond a diff skim: judges the diff against the repo's own .rules/, confirms the PR's stated claims are true, runs the PR's tests on the PR branch, and stages real data so the human can manually exercise the change. The deliverable is a review plus a copy-paste test plan, not just opinions.
Core principle: Don't trust the PR description — verify every claim against the code, then prove the behavior with real data.
Workflow
Work top to bottom. Each step feeds the next.
1. Pull the PR
gh pr view <N> --json title,body,author,baseRefName,headRefName,state,additions,deletions,changedFiles,labels
gh pr diff <N> --name-only # scope
gh pr diff <N> # full diff
2. Load the rules you'll judge against
Read .rules/*.md for every changed file's domain before forming opinions. The common offenders:
react.md#2 —setStatecalled synchronously inuseEffect(async-after-awaitis fine). Very common in modal/form PRs.react.md#1 — exhaustiveuseEffect/useMemo/useCallbackdeps.typescript.md— noany.rust.md— pure helpers extracted + unit-tested;mod.rsstays orchestration-only; public APIs re-exported on refactor.general.md— English-only comments; new user-facing strings need i18n keys insrc/i18n/locales/*.
3. Verify the PR's claims — don't take them on faith
For each factual assertion in the description, prove it:
- "Uses
common.search/common.noResultsi18n keys" →grep '"search"\|"noResults"' src/i18n/locales/en.json. - "Removing
searchable={false}enables search" → read the component default (grep searchable src/components/ui/Select.tsx). - "Reads
default_portfrom the manifest" → check the type (src/types/plugins.ts) — is it nullable? What's the fallback? - New Tauri command → confirm it's registered in
src-tauri/src/lib.rsinvoke_handler.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 85 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A ab3336e078f7
tabularis-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository TabularisDB/tabularis (4,799 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 1,387 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gonavi-cli
Operate databases through the GoNavi headless CLI — the gonavi executable shipped in verified GitHub Release archives. Covers listing/adding/importing saved connections, running SQL queries against saved connections or ad-hoc connection files, exporting result sets to csv/json/md/html/xlsx, batch-executing SQL files…
code-review
Comprehensive code review assistant that analyzes code quality, security, and best practices.
trellis-check
Comprehensive quality verification: spec compliance, lint, type-check, tests, cross-layer data flow, code reuse, and consistency checks. Use when code is written and needs quality verification, before committing changes, or to catch context drift during long sessions.
codex-bridge
A workflow for asking the Codex command-line tool to review a plan, implement approved code changes, revise an implementation, or check findings. The command-line tool is a separate coding-agent interface that can work in controlled read-only or workspace-writing modes.
readmd-code-review
Use when code blocks in a Markdown document need a security, correctness, and maintainability review.
persona-review
A format for writing short pull-request review comments, with each comment naming the location, problem, fix, and severity. A pull request is a proposed code change for review.