Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tacticlaunch/mcp-linear. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tacticlaunch/mcp-linear/main/.github/skills/mcp-pr-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tacticlaunch/mcp-linearWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tacticlaunch/mcp-linear/mcp-pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tacticlaunch/mcp-linear/mcp-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tacticlaunch/mcp-linear/mcp-pr-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00175 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00088 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
mcp-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use this review workflow for mcp-linear pull requests.
Review focus
- Input schema and type guard alignment.
- Output schema and normalized service output alignment.
- Nullable field handling, especially for update and clear operations.
- Missing handler or index registration.
- Missing
TOOLS.mdupdates. - Direct GraphQL added without a clear SDK rationale.
- Missing tests for negative validation paths, nullable updates, or SDK fallback behavior.
Expected output
- Findings first.
- Order findings by severity.
- Include exact file references.
- If no issues are found, say so explicitly and call out any remaining live-test risk.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 24 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 899e24cd48b7
mcp-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository tacticlaunch/mcp-linear (146 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 175 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sdd-tasks
Break an SDD change into implementation tasks. Trigger: orchestrator launches task planning for a change.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
pr-blocker-summarizer
Summarizes open pull requests into a blockers-first standup digest. Activates when the user asks to summarize open PRs, find blocked pull requests, generate a PR standup, or triage review backlog from a PR export.
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
pr-reviewer
Reviews a Git branch as a pull request against the base branch (auto-resolved from origin/HEAD — usually main or master) using this repo's own rules — the CLAUDE.md constitution and the .claude/skills/ that apply to the changed files. Fetches the branch, switches to it, diffs it against the merge-base, routes the…
ijfw-cross-audit
Generate a cross-platform multi-model audit (Trident) on a diff, brief, or artifact. Trigger: 'cross audit', 'Trident', 'second opinion', 'check with other models', 'check with other AIs', 'cross-check this', 'get another perspective', /cross-audit.