uv-sbom: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md

code-review is a skill for Claude Code from Taketo-Yoda/uv-sbom. It costs 19 tokens per session (4,739 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review workflow that sends the current Git changes to a separate reviewer agent, which checks architecture, design, and code quality. A code review is a structured check of changes before they are accepted.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before committing changes, or as part of an implementation workflow, to inspect changed files and address review findings.
Why use it?
It provides a focused review of the diff without repeating the project’s formatting, lint, or CI checks. Failed reviews can lead to fixes and another review.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is Taketo-Yoda/uv-sbom's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on uv-sbom itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything uv-sbom configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to Taketo-Yoda/uv-sbom. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Taketo-Yoda/uv-sbom/develop/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Taketo-Yoda/uv-sbom

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 19 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,739 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to low

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • low Excessive Agency · line 42
    Skill's behavior or capabilities extend beyond its stated purpose. Scope creep allows an agent to perform actions unrelated to its documented functionality, increasing the attack surface.
    Fix: Limit the skill's scope to its documented purpose. Remove instructions that enable the agent to perform actions outside its stated functionality.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00019 $0.04739
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.01896
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00948
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00474

Measured 19d ago against content hash 58c391b813b7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 440 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 440 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/code-review - Code Review Skill

Spawns a dedicated Reviewer Agent to evaluate the current git diff HEAD against architectural, design, and quality criteria specific to uv-sbom.

This skill does NOT re-run CI checks (cargo fmt, clippy). Those are enforced by the /commit skill and the CI pipeline.

Invocation

Standalone: Invoke at any time to review uncommitted changes. Integrated: Called automatically by /implement Step 4.5 before /commit.

Workflow

Step 1: Collect diff
Step 2: Spawn Reviewer Agent (foreground)
Step 3: Parse result (PASS / FAIL)
  ├── PASS → run Step 3.5, then report success, return control to caller
  └── FAIL → apply fixes, increment counter, return to Step 1
             (max 3 iterations; halt and report if still failing)
Step 3.5: Follow-up Issue Gate (runs once, at the terminal state only —
          after PASS, or after the final post-3-iteration report)

Steps

Step 1: Collect Diff and File Content

git diff HEAD --name-only   # list changed files
git diff HEAD               # full diff for the reviewer

For each file listed by --name-only, also read its full current content. This is required for file-size checks and documentation coverage checks.

In addition, run the following scan and include its output as supplemental context for criterion 11:

grep -rn 'eprintln!\|println!' src/ \
  | grep -v 'msgs\.\|Messages::' \
  | grep -v '#\[cfg(test)\]' \
  | grep -v '\.rs:.*//.*i18n-ok'
  • Lines in changed files: flag as 🔴 MUST FIX under criterion 11.
  • Lines in unchanged files: flag as 🟡 SHOULD FIX (pre-existing violation).

If any changed file is under .claude/, also include the full content of .claude/conventions/README.md and every file it indexes, as supplemental context for criterion 3.

If git diff HEAD is empty, report "Nothing to review — no uncommitted changes." and exit.

Step 2: Spawn Reviewer Agent

Use the Agent tool with subagent_type: "general-purpose", run foreground.

Read the full file on GitHub · 440 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 19d ago Changed · +9 lines 58c391b813b7
  2. 25d ago Changed · -4 lines e537d9b54651
  3. 1mo ago Changed · +9 lines 13ee805fca2f
  4. 1mo ago Changed · +73 lines f1480f0306cc
  5. 1mo ago First seen · 353 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A c302c47301bb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Taketo-Yoda/uv-sbom (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 4,739 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.