verification-loop

A pre-commit and pre-release checklist for checking a ClaudeTerminal application's Rust backend, TypeScript frontend, build, formatting, linting, and security-related requirements. Type checking finds code that uses values in invalid ways before the program runs.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before significant commits, releases, or after resolving merge conflicts to run the project's backend and frontend checks and validate their connection.
Why use it?
It gathers important project checks into one repeatable verification process, helping catch compilation, type, formatting, build, and integration problems early.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/talayash/agentrium/verification-loop
Any agent
npx skills add talayash/agentrium --skill verification-loop
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/talayash/agentrium

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 14 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 526 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00014 $0.00526
Opus 5 $0.00007 $0.00263
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00105
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00053

Measured 2d ago against content hash 903e27e09be1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verification-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/verification-loop/SKILL.md · 79 lines

What it actually says

Verification Loop

A systematic verification pipeline that checks all aspects of project health before commits or releases.

When to Use

  • Before committing significant changes
  • Before creating a release
  • After resolving merge conflicts
  • When /verify command is invoked

Pipeline Phases

Phase 1: Rust Backend Compilation

cd src-tauri && cargo check 2>&1
  • Must compile with zero errors
  • Warnings are acceptable but should be noted

Phase 2: Rust Linting

cd src-tauri && cargo clippy -- -W clippy::all 2>&1
  • All clippy warnings should be addressed
  • #[allow(clippy::...)] only with justification

Phase 3: Rust Formatting

cd src-tauri && cargo fmt --check 2>&1
  • Must pass with no formatting changes needed

Phase 4: TypeScript Type Check

npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1
  • Zero type errors
  • Strict mode compliance

Phase 5: Frontend Build

npm run build 2>&1
  • Vite production build must succeed
  • Check for bundle size warnings

Phase 6: IPC Contract Validation

  • Every #[tauri::command] in commands.rs registered in main.rs
  • Every invoke() in frontend matches a registered command
  • Event names consistent between emit() and listen()

Phase 7: Security Quick Scan

  • No .unwrap() in production Rust code (use ? or .map_err())
  • No hardcoded secrets/tokens
  • No eval() or innerHTML in frontend
  • No console.log with sensitive data

Report Template

| Phase | Status | Duration | Notes |
|-------|--------|----------|-------|
| Rust compile | ✅/❌ | Xs | |
| Clippy | ✅/❌ | Xs | |
| Formatting | ✅/❌ | Xs | |
| TypeScript | ✅/❌ | Xs | |
| Vite build | ✅/❌ | Xs | |
| IPC contracts | ✅/❌ | - | |
| Security scan | ✅/❌ | - | |

**Result: PASS / FAIL**
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 79 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 903e27e09be1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verification-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository talayash/agentrium (39 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 526 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

pre-landing-review

Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by BitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…

GCWing/BitFun · 74 tokens

wechat-article-writer

公众号/自媒体全流程。根据用户表述自动匹配:撰写文章、封面图、正文插图、风格提取。支持多种写作风格。当用户提到写公众号、技术博客、公众号封面、正文插图、步骤图、演示图、流程示意、分析写作风格、克隆文风、模仿爆款、提取风格时使用。详见 reference 目录。.

xstongxue/best-skills · 105 tokens

miniapp-dev

Develops, maintains, and generates BitFun MiniApps (Zero-Dialect Runtime). Use when (1) working on miniapp framework code under src/crates/assembly/core/src/miniapp/ or src/web-ui/src/app/scenes/miniapps/; or (2) generating / creating / designing a NEW MiniApp for the user — including any request like "做一个小应用 / 生成…

GCWing/BitFun · 143 tokens

vibe-research

Deep research and market validation for app ideas. Use when starting a new project, validating an idea, or when the user says "research my idea", "validate my app", or "help me start a new project".

KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template · 49 tokens

commit-push-pr

Commit selected local changes, push the branch, and create or update a GitHub pull request with BitFun attribution. Use when the user asks to 提交 PR、提代码、commit and push、开 PR、create a pull request, or wants a Claude Code-like one-command PR publishing flow from BitFun.

GCWing/BitFun · 68 tokens

investigate

Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT debug…

GCWing/BitFun · 112 tokens