Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/talayash/agentrium/verification-loopnpx skills add talayash/agentrium --skill verification-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/talayash/agentriumWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00526 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00263 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
verification-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Verification Loop
A systematic verification pipeline that checks all aspects of project health before commits or releases.
When to Use
- Before committing significant changes
- Before creating a release
- After resolving merge conflicts
- When
/verifycommand is invoked
Pipeline Phases
Phase 1: Rust Backend Compilation
cd src-tauri && cargo check 2>&1
- Must compile with zero errors
- Warnings are acceptable but should be noted
Phase 2: Rust Linting
cd src-tauri && cargo clippy -- -W clippy::all 2>&1
- All clippy warnings should be addressed
#[allow(clippy::...)]only with justification
Phase 3: Rust Formatting
cd src-tauri && cargo fmt --check 2>&1
- Must pass with no formatting changes needed
Phase 4: TypeScript Type Check
npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1
- Zero type errors
- Strict mode compliance
Phase 5: Frontend Build
npm run build 2>&1
- Vite production build must succeed
- Check for bundle size warnings
Phase 6: IPC Contract Validation
- Every
#[tauri::command]incommands.rsregistered inmain.rs - Every
invoke()in frontend matches a registered command - Event names consistent between
emit()andlisten()
Phase 7: Security Quick Scan
- No
.unwrap()in production Rust code (use?or.map_err()) - No hardcoded secrets/tokens
- No
eval()orinnerHTMLin frontend - No
console.logwith sensitive data
Report Template
| Phase | Status | Duration | Notes |
|-------|--------|----------|-------|
| Rust compile | ✅/❌ | Xs | |
| Clippy | ✅/❌ | Xs | |
| Formatting | ✅/❌ | Xs | |
| TypeScript | ✅/❌ | Xs | |
| Vite build | ✅/❌ | Xs | |
| IPC contracts | ✅/❌ | - | |
| Security scan | ✅/❌ | - | |
**Result: PASS / FAIL**
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 79 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 903e27e09be1
verification-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository talayash/agentrium (39 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 526 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pre-landing-review
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by BitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…
wechat-article-writer
公众号/自媒体全流程。根据用户表述自动匹配:撰写文章、封面图、正文插图、风格提取。支持多种写作风格。当用户提到写公众号、技术博客、公众号封面、正文插图、步骤图、演示图、流程示意、分析写作风格、克隆文风、模仿爆款、提取风格时使用。详见 reference 目录。.
miniapp-dev
Develops, maintains, and generates BitFun MiniApps (Zero-Dialect Runtime). Use when (1) working on miniapp framework code under src/crates/assembly/core/src/miniapp/ or src/web-ui/src/app/scenes/miniapps/; or (2) generating / creating / designing a NEW MiniApp for the user — including any request like "做一个小应用 / 生成…
vibe-research
Deep research and market validation for app ideas. Use when starting a new project, validating an idea, or when the user says "research my idea", "validate my app", or "help me start a new project".
commit-push-pr
Commit selected local changes, push the branch, and create or update a GitHub pull request with BitFun attribution. Use when the user asks to 提交 PR、提代码、commit and push、开 PR、create a pull request, or wants a Claude Code-like one-command PR publishing flow from BitFun.
investigate
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT debug…