Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TalonT-Org/AutoSkillit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TalonT-Org/AutoSkillit/main/.claude/skills/audit-tests/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TalonT-Org/AutoSkillitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/audit-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/audit-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/audit-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/audit-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/audit-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.04474 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.01790 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00895 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00447 |
Grade A, and why
audit-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 293 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Suite Audit Skill
Audit the test suite to identify useless tests, consolidation opportunities, quality issues, and tests that don't validate what they claim. Produces an actionable improvement plan with explanations.
When to Use
- User says "audit tests", "audit test suite", "review tests"
- User wants "test quality check" or "test cleanup"
- User asks to "find useless tests" or "consolidate tests"
Intended Test Directory Structure
The test suite mirrors the source sub-package hierarchy rather than using a type-based unit/integration split — the project's IL-0–IL-3 layer boundaries already encode isolation levels. Each sub-package gets its own test directory. Cross-cutting concerns go in dedicated directories:
tests/
├── conftest.py # Shared: MockSubprocessRunner, tool_ctx fixture (wired via make_context)
├── CLAUDE.md # xdist safety guidelines
├── core/ # IL-0: tests for autoskillit/core/ (io, logging, paths, types, protocols)
├── config/ # IL-1: tests for autoskillit/config/
├── pipeline/ # IL-1: tests for autoskillit/pipeline/ (audit, gate, context, tokens)
├── execution/ # IL-1: tests for autoskillit/execution/ (db, github, headless, process, quota, session, testing)
├── workspace/ # IL-1: tests for autoskillit/workspace/ (cleanup, clone, skills)
├── recipe/ # IL-2: tests for autoskillit/recipe/ (io, loader, schema, validator, rules, smoke)
├── migration/ # IL-2: tests for autoskillit/migration/ (engine, loader, store)
├── server/ # IL-3: tests for autoskillit/server/ (_factory, git, helpers, tools_*)
├── cli/ # IL-3: tests for autoskillit/cli/
├── arch/ # Cross-cutting: AST architecture enforcement, import contracts, layer rules
├── contracts/ # Cross-cutting: instruction surface, MCP/API surface, version consistency
└── infra/ # Cross-cutting: CI/dev config checks (.pre-commit, .gitleaks, .github/)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 293 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A bf489fd8aa77
audit-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository TalonT-Org/AutoSkillit (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 4,474 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-review
You are an expert DataHub test reviewer. Your role is to evaluate pytest smoke tests against established testing standards, identify issues, and provide actionable feedback.
grade-tests
Grade curated individual tests for readiness, A-F quality and improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Return Pass/Failed/Uncertain/Not applicable; unresolved/empty…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
brooks-test
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…
dart-mechanical-refactor
DART Mechanical Refactor: perform a behavior-preserving mechanical refactor.
aqe-review-quality
Review Agentic QE changes and issue an evidence-backed quality verdict. Use for code review, regression-risk assessment, release readiness, quality-gate evaluation, security/performance/testability review, or checking whether a change has sufficient verification. Do not use when the user primarily asks to implement a…