Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TanKimGwan/linmas --skill linmas-secure-code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TanKimGwan/linmasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tankimgwan/linmas/linmas-secure-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tankimgwan/linmas/linmas-secure-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tankimgwan/linmas/linmas-secure-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tankimgwan/linmas/linmas-secure-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tankimgwan/linmas/linmas-secure-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.05133 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.02567 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01027 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00513 |
Grade A, and why
linmas-secure-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 448 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 75f4015fa865
linmas-secure-code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository TanKimGwan/linmas (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 5,133 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-helper
Analyze source code for common security weaknesses across multiple languages and help Claude explain findings, severity, and remediation clearly.
compliance-checker
Check affiliate content for FTC compliance and platform rules. Triggers on: "check my content for compliance", "FTC disclosure check", "is this legal", "review for compliance", "check affiliate disclosure", "am I FTC compliant", "audit my content", "compliance review", "legal check", "platform rules check", "check…
self-improver
Review affiliate campaign results and improve strategy. Triggers on: "review my results", "what went wrong", "how to improve conversions", "analyze my campaign", "affiliate retrospective", "why am I not converting", "improve my strategy", "what should I change", "campaign review", "optimize my approach", "learn from…
building-ransomware-playbook-with-cisa-framework
Builds a structured ransomware incident response playbook aligned with the CISA StopRansomware Guide and NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Covers preparation, detection, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident phases with actionable checklists. Activates for requests involving ransomware response planning…
audit-expert
Expert-level security auditing, compliance, code review, and vulnerability assessment. Use when the user mentions compliance, security review, code review, vulnerability assessment, SOC 2, or GDPR, or when the task involves Audit Types, Audit Frameworks, Audit Process, or Authentication Review.
sast-scanning
Perform static application security testing with tools like Semgrep, CodeQL, and SonarQube. Identify security vulnerabilities in source code before deployment. Use when implementing secure SDLC, code review automation, or security gates in CI/CD pipelines.