Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TarrySingh/hulde-review --skill hulde-explaingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TarrySingh/hulde-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tarrysingh/hulde-review/hulde-explain)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tarrysingh/hulde-review/hulde-explain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tarrysingh/hulde-review/hulde-explain/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tarrysingh/hulde-review/hulde-explain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tarrysingh/hulde-review/hulde-explain.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00738 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
hulde-explain scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/hulde-explain
Provide a thorough, in-depth explanation of a specific code component.
Graph Structure Reference
The knowledge graph JSON has this structure:
project— {name, description, languages, frameworks, analyzedAt, gitCommitHash}nodes[]— each has {id, type, name, filePath, summary, tags[], complexity, languageNotes?}- Node types: file, function, class, module, concept
- IDs:
file:path,func:path:name,class:path:name
edges[]— each has {source, target, type, direction, weight}- Key types: imports, contains, calls, depends_on
layers[]— each has {id, name, description, nodeIds[]}tour[]— each has {order, title, description, nodeIds[]}
How to Read Efficiently
- Use Grep to search within the JSON for relevant entries BEFORE reading the full file
- Only read sections you need — don't dump the entire graph into context
- Node names and summaries are the most useful fields for understanding
- Edges tell you how components connect — follow imports and calls for dependency chains
Instructions
-
Check that
.hulde-review/knowledge-graph.jsonexists. If not, tell the user to run/hulde-reviewfirst. -
Find the target node — use Grep to search the knowledge graph for the component: "$ARGUMENTS"
- For file paths (e.g.,
src/auth/login.ts): search for"filePath"matches - For function notation (e.g.,
src/auth/login.ts:verifyToken): search for the function name in"name"fields filtered by the file path - Note the exact node
id,type,summary,tags, andcomplexity
- For file paths (e.g.,
-
Find all connected edges — Grep for the target node's ID in the edges section:
"source"matches → things this node calls/imports/depends on (outgoing)"target"matches → things that call/import/depend on this node (incoming)- Note the connected node IDs and edge types
-
Read connected nodes — for each connected node ID from step 3, Grep for those IDs in the nodes section to get their
name,summary, andtype. This builds the component's neighborhood.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 57 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 0277d55ae598
hulde-explain is a skill published in the GitHub repository TarrySingh/hulde-review (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 738 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
system-architect
This skill should be used when the user asks to "design a system", "architect a solution", "review architecture", "plan a refactoring", "evaluate technical trade-offs", or discusses software architecture patterns. Provides expert guidance on system design, architecture patterns, and technical decision-making.
grill
This skill should be used when the user asks to "grill", "interrogate", "stress-test a spec/plan", "adversarially review a proposal", or invokes /craft:grill. Convergent counterpart to brainstorm — interrogates a spec/plan/topic one question at a time to surface gaps, contradictions, and unresolved dependencies before…
architecture-review
Conducts a comprehensive multi-perspective architecture review using ALL architecture team members. Use when the user requests "Start architecture review", "Full architecture review", "Review architecture for version X.Y.Z", "Conduct comprehensive review", or when they want assessment from multiple perspectives. Do…
specialist-review
Conducts a focused review from ONE specific specialist's perspective (e.g., Security Specialist, Performance Expert). Use when the user requests "Ask [specialist role] to review [target]", "Get [specialist]'s opinion on [topic]", "Have [role] review [code/component]", or when they want deep expertise in ONE specific…
understand-diff
Use when you need to analyze git diffs or pull requests to understand what changed, affected components, and risks.
code-quality-principles
Applies KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID principles for clean code with reduced complexity. Use when refactoring or reviewing code for over-engineering.