Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills --skill project-closeoutgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/project-closeout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/project-closeout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/project-closeout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/project-closeout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/project-closeout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.01797 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00898 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00359 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00180 |
Grade A, and why
project-closeout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
项目收尾检查 Skill
项目结束后的最后一道门。确保下次打开项目时,文档是自洽的、问题是已追踪的、系统是可运行的。
知识导航表(执行前必须理解的概念根)
| 层级 | 文档 | 需要理解的概念 |
|---|---|---|
| D0 认知根(必读) | _内部总控/认知结构/L1_系统性文档/系统架构思维维度/Skill体系设计原则_v1.0.md |
§4 文档体系:K4项目规格文档(产品定义/技术架构/开发计划)的完整性要求;文档是结果不是原因 |
| D3 规范参考 | — | 本 Skill 为只读审查,无修改操作(发现问题→路由到对应修复Skill) |
| D4 运行时数据 | 项目全部文档:产品定义.md + 技术架构.md + 开发计划.md + 问题追踪台.md |
被审查的K4项目规格文档(审查对象) |
核心概念速查: ① 收尾检查 ≠ 复盘:本 Skill 检查K4文档自洽性,project-retrospective 处理B/K对象Gap ② 三角色视角:PM视角(产品定义完整性)+ 架构师视角(技术文档准确性)+ 开发视角(实现与计划对齐) ③ 发现问题后路由,不直接修复:不同类型的问题路由到 issue-tracker / project-retrospective / role-* Skill
激活后立即执行(顺序不可跳过)
Step 1 Read: 产品经理/产品问题追踪台.md → 列出所有「未解决」项
Step 2 Read: 技术架构师/技术问题追踪台.md → 列出所有「未解决」项
Step 3 扫描核心文档完整性(见下方清单)
Step 4 检查代码/服务健康状态(见下方清单)
Step 5 输出收尾报告(见格式)
Step 6 引导经验沉淀(PD-001 Gap 修复)
收尾报告完成后,主动提示:
「✅ 收尾检查完成。
下一步建议:说「做项目复盘」触发 project-retrospective,
将本次调用过的 Skill 经验批量沉淀到 SKILL-INDEX,
并处理 PENDING-EXPERIENCES 中的待处理条目。」
文档完整性检查清单
□ 产品设计文档(最新版)存在且有日期
□ 技术架构文档(最新版)存在且有日期
□ 开发计划(任务状态是否都已更新)
□ 开发计划是否包含本次新增功能/服务的任务条目(防止新工作漏登记)
□ 追踪台中的「已修复」条目有处理记录
□ 产品文档中「✅ 已实现」功能与代码实际吻合
□ 产品文档中「🔲 未实现」功能在追踪台或开发计划中有记录
□ workspace-main/skills/ 目录下的 Skill 文件与代码内置 Skill 是否同步
□ 高依赖度文档(跨项目协调框架、API契约、架构设计等被多个项目引用的治理文档)
是否做了 F-022 挑战者反思 + 关卡B 审核(若未做,需在下次打开前补做)
代码健康检查清单
□ 服务是否可正常启动(前端 + 后端端口均可访问)
□ 无已知 P0 Bug 处于「未解决」状态
□ 测试文件是否在正确位置(不在 uvicorn watch 目录)
□ vite.config.ts 代理端口与当前后端端口一致
□ .env 配置完整(LLM_API_KEY、WORKSPACE_MAIN_DIR 等)
收尾报告格式
## 项目收尾报告 · [项目名] · YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM
### 一、未解决问题
#### 产品设计类(来自产品问题追踪台)
| ID | 描述 | 优先级 | 建议下步 |
#### 技术实现类(来自技术问题追踪台)
| ID | 描述 | 优先级 | 建议下步 |
### 二、文档状态
| 文档 | 状态 | 备注 |
### 三、服务状态
| 服务 | 端口 | 状态 |
### 四、下次打开前必做
(按优先级列出,让下次接手的人/AI 知道从哪里开始)
### 五、已完成亮点
(本次工作完成的核心功能,存档备忘)
变更记录
v1.2 — 2026-03-21 — 文档扫描清单补充2项(project-retrospective 20260321)
根因③(B类步骤偏差):2026-03-21 项目收尾检查时,报告未主动提示「高依赖度治理文档(跨项目协调框架)未做 F-022 + 关卡B」,需用户主动发现并提醒,违反「收尾检查是最后一道门」的设计原则。
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 139 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A a1c714934d13
project-closeout is a skill published in the GitHub repository TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills (20 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 1,797 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Paranoid staff engineer code review mode. Finds bugs that pass CI but break in production. Use when user says /review, asks for code review, wants to check for bugs, or before merging important changes.
github-repo-triage
Triage and maintain GitHub repositories — assess open issues/PRs, cherry-pick contributions, manage releases, and publish packages. Use when the user wants to catch up on a repo, review open issues, merge community PRs, cut a release, or publish to package registries.
review
Code review checklist — catch bugs, security issues, and design problems before merging.
team
Coordinate parallel work across multiple Cursor sessions via shared .omc/team/ state.
code-review-codex
Final-gate code review via Codex CLI (codex-5.3, xhigh). Finds bugs, security issues, and regressions before commit. No edits — findings report only.
spec-review-codex
Audit project specs for conflicts, goal drift, ambiguity, and gaps via Codex CLI (gpt-5.2, xhigh). Read-only findings report.