Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Team-Deepiri/deepiri-axiom --skill axiom-test-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Team-Deepiri/deepiri-axiomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/team-deepiri/deepiri-axiom/axiom-test-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/team-deepiri/deepiri-axiom/axiom-test-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/team-deepiri/deepiri-axiom/axiom-test-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/team-deepiri/deepiri-axiom/axiom-test-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/team-deepiri/deepiri-axiom/axiom-test-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00159 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00079 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
axiom-test-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Axiom Test Plan
Use when a PR lacks an explicit test plan, or when reviewing whether one is sufficient.
Shape
- Unit — what pure logic changed and what asserts it.
- Integration — what service boundary or DB interaction needs a real (or realistic) dependency to verify.
- Manual — what can only be checked by hand (UI, timing-sensitive behavior) and the exact steps to do it.
A test plan that only lists "ran the existing test suite" for a PR that adds new behavior is not a test plan — it needs a new test for the new behavior.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 16 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 0499548e2dc5
axiom-test-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository Team-Deepiri/deepiri-axiom (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 159 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
nw-fp-clojure
Clojure language-specific patterns, data-first modeling, REPL-driven development, and spec.
mobiai-ios-testing
Use when writing or running tests in an iOS project — unit tests, UI tests, snapshot tests, choosing the right framework.
restore-internals-seams-in-finally-blocks-after-each-test
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
unit-test-parameterized
Provides parameterized testing patterns with JUnit 5, generates data-driven unit tests using @ParameterizedTest, @ValueSource, @CsvSource, @MethodSource. Creates tests that run the same logic with multiple input values. Use when writing data-driven Java tests, multiple test cases from single method, or boundary value…