Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/fixing-cinpx skills add technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins --skill fixing-cigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/fixing-ci)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/fixing-ci"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/fixing-ci.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01916 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00958 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00383 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
fixing-ci scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fixing CI
Overview
This skill drives an iterative CI fix session: investigate the failure (via the Buildkite investigation skill), apply a fix, verify it locally, push, watch the new build, and iterate until green or until you've hit the iteration cap and need to step back.
The scope is the fix loop only — investigation is delegated to buildkite:investigating-builds, which already covers bktide snapshot, log reading, and failure-pattern recognition.
When to Use
- You have a failing CI build and want to push fixes until it goes green
- You want to verify changes locally before each push (saves CI cycles)
- You're iterating on fixes across multiple builds and need to know when to step back
When NOT to Use
- First-time "why did this fail" investigation with no fix-and-push intent → use
buildkite:investigating-buildsdirectly - Authoring or modifying pipeline YAML → use
buildkite:developing-pipelines - GitHub Actions, CircleCI, or non-Buildkite CI
Input Contract
The skill needs to know what to fix. Any one of these inputs is sufficient:
build_url— A Buildkite build URL (e.g.https://buildkite.com/org/pipeline/builds/123)pr— A GitHub PR number (resolves to its latest failing build for that branch)branch— A git branch name (resolves to its open PR's latest failing build)
Resolving inputs
If the caller provides one of the above, use it directly. Otherwise:
- From cwd: read the current git branch (
git branch --show-current), look for an open PR (gh pr view --json number,headRefName), find its latest failing build via thebuildkite:investigating-buildsskill's "Checking Current Branch/PR Status" workflow. - If cwd doesn't resolve cleanly (no branch, no open PR, no failing build): the caller (slash-command wrapper or workflow agent) is responsible for either asking the user or failing with a clear message. This skill assumes resolution is done before its loop starts.
Step 1: Capture Initial State
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 173 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 15be808a4305
fixing-ci is a skill published in the GitHub repository technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins (10 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,916 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
turborepo
Turborepo monorepo build system guidance. Triggers on: turbo.json, task pipelines, dependsOn, caching, remote cache, the "turbo" CLI, --filter, --affected, CI optimization, environment variables, internal packages, monorepo structure/best practices, and boundaries. Use when user: configures tasks/workflows/pipelines…
ci-fix-failure
Diagnose failing GitHub Actions runs and propose fixes. Use when given a GHA run/job URL, or asked why CI failed, why a job failed, what broke in a run, or to fix a red check on a PR.
ci-push-workflow-health
Analyze CI failure patterns for push-triggered workflow jobs on main and stable/ branches. Use when asked about CI health, broken jobs, flaky workflows, failure rates, or push-trigger problems.
act-testing
Prepares act-testable GitHub Actions workflow scenarios for this monorepo. Use when validating workflow logic locally, generating temporary test harnesses, checking logic drift, assessing local act feasibility, and proposing reproducible user-run test cases.
ci-flood-triage
Triages a flood of CI incidents in camunda/camunda. Use when multiple CI incidents open in a short window and the medic needs to orient fast — find the shared pattern, identify outliers, and know what to do next. Re-runnable as new incidents arrive.
ci-incident
Drive CI incident response in camunda/camunda. Use when asked to resolve, respond to, or drive a CI incident by ID. Full incidents only, not alerts.