Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/telus-labs/stagecraftnpx agentmods add skills/telus-labs/stagecraft/platform-pre-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/telus-labs/stagecraft/platform-pre-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/telus-labs/stagecraft/platform-pre-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/telus-labs/stagecraft/platform-pre-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/telus-labs/stagecraft/platform-pre-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/telus-labs/stagecraft/platform-pre-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 36 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 37 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.01639 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00820 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00328 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
platform-pre-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Platform Pre-Review Task (Stage 4a)
Use this skill when you are the Platform Developer executing the Stage 4a pre-review gate — after all Stage 4 build gates pass and before Stage 5 peer review starts.
Procedure
-
npm run lint(or the project's equivalent) — must exit 0. -
The project's type-check command if one is configured (e.g.
tsc --noEmitfor TypeScript projects) — must exit 0. -
Dependency vulnerability scan:
npm audit --audit-level=high(orpip-audit,bundler-audit, etc. per stack). Anyhighorcriticalfinding halts. -
License compatibility check. For every new or changed direct dependency (compare
package.json/requirements.txt/Cargo.tomlbefore and after the PR), determine its declared SPDX license and classify it:- Allowed (record nothing): MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause, ISC, CC0-1.0, 0BSD, Unlicense, CC-BY-4.0, Python-2.0, PSF-2.0.
- Warned (record with
policy: "warned"): UNLICENSED, unknown, proprietary, SSPL-1.0, BUSL-1.1. These require a human review before merge; record inlicense_findings[]and add awarnings[]entry. - Denied (record with
policy: "denied"): any GPL-2.0, GPL-3.0, LGPL-2.0, LGPL-2.1, LGPL-3.0, AGPL-3.0, or strong-copyleft variant. Copyleft licenses require distributing source and are incompatible with most commercial projects unless a legal exception is documented. A denied finding setslicense_check_passed: falseand adds ablockers[]entry.
How to check:
# Node.js — use npx if license-checker is not installed globally npx license-checker --direct --json 2>/dev/null | jq 'to_entries[] | {package: .key, license: .value.licenses}' # Python pip-licenses --format=json --with-license-file 2>/dev/null # Rust cargo license --json 2>/dev/nullIf no automated tool is available, manually inspect each new dependency's
LICENSEfile or package metadata. When the license field is missing or ambiguous, classify aswarned.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 137 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 6a65e5ceb0ae
platform-pre-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository telus-labs/stagecraft (6 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,639 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
intuitive-tests
Use this skill whenever the user asks about unit test best practices, test organization, flat test suites, redundant tests, test refactors, pytest/JUnit/Jest/xUnit layout, test taxonomy, flaky tests, coverage quality, fixtures, mocks, parametrization, pruning existing UTs, or "which tests are worth keeping." It…
verify
Run the HUMHUM quality gates that are actually touched by the current diff — frontend typecheck + vitest, and Rust fmt/clippy/test — mirroring CI. Use before marking work done, opening a PR, or when asked to "verify", "check", or "run the gates".
test-generation
Generate comprehensive tests for code including unit tests, integration tests, and edge case coverage. Analyzes code to identify testable units and generates tests matching the project's testing framework and conventions.
foundry-hosted-agent-validation
Step-by-step process for validating a Python Foundry hosted agent sample (under python/samples/04-hosting/foundry-hosted-agents/) end to end — running it locally (native runtime and azd ai agent run) and after deploying it to an Azure AI Foundry project with azd. Use this when asked to validate a hosted agent sample.
build-and-test
How to build and test .NET projects in the Agent Framework repository. Use this when verifying or testing changes.
writing-tests
Write unit tests, component tests, and integration tests for AiderDesk using Vitest and React Testing Library. Use when creating new tests, adding test coverage, configuring mocks, setting up test files, or debugging failing tests.