improve-plan

improve-plan is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from TentacleOpera/switchboard. It costs 0 tokens per session (3,924 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for strengthening an existing feature plan without changing project source files. It updates only the plan and preserves factual requirements while marking replaced decisions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing and revising feature plans before implementation.
Why use it?
It helps improve a plan without accidentally removing its original scope or silently changing its recorded decisions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/tentacleopera/switchboard/improve-plan
Any agent
npx skills add TentacleOpera/switchboard --skill improve-plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TentacleOpera/switchboard

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for improve-plan

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tentacleopera/switchboard/improve-plan.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tentacleopera/switchboard/improve-plan)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tentacleopera/switchboard/improve-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tentacleopera/switchboard/improve-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,924 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.03924
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.01962
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00785
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00392

Measured 4d ago against content hash 660fdd1af489, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

improve-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/protocols/improve-plan/SKILL.md · 181 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Improve Plan

Use this workflow to strengthen an existing feature plan in a single fluid pass.

Critical Constraints

  • NO IMPLEMENTATION: You are strictly FORBIDDEN from modifying any project source files. Your ONLY permissible write action is updating the existing Feature Plan document.
  • CONTENT PRESERVATION (two-tier):
    • Factual context — NEVER delete. Goal statements, product scope, requirements, constraints, environment details, and problem/background analysis must be preserved verbatim. This includes product scope explicitly stated in the plan's Goal or Problem Description — you must not narrow or remove supported scenarios (e.g. multi-root workspaces) even if the current session is single-repo. If you believe a goal or scope statement is wrong, flag it in chat for the user — do not unilaterally correct it.

    • Reasoning outputs — correct with audit marking. Conclusions, chosen approaches, design decisions, and code examples may be corrected or replaced when the improve pass produces a better alternative. Every correction MUST be marked with a superseded callout so the change is auditable:

      Superseded: Reason: Replaced with:

      Never silently delete a conclusion and write a new one in its place. The callout is the audit trail — without it, the change is a protocol violation.

  • SESSION vs PRODUCT SCOPE: Session directives (e.g. "single-repo", "skip compilation", "skip tests") constrain HOW you verify and organize the plan, not WHAT the plan covers. Do not conflate repo structure constraints with product feature requirements. If the plan targets multi-root workspaces, you must preserve and improve that scope regardless of the current session's repo configuration. Never transcribe a session directive into the plan file — not as a note, a caveat, or an explanation of what this run did or did not do. It binds you, not the reader. Written down it inverts: a later coder reads a constraint on the planner as an instruction to itself, and follows the document over the live dispatch that contradicts it.
  • SINGLE PASS: Complete enhancement, dependency checks, the architecture challenge (Step 4), adversarial critique, balanced synthesis, and plan update in one continuous response.

Read the full file on GitHub · 181 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 181 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 660fdd1af489

Subscribe to this mod's changes

improve-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository TentacleOpera/switchboard (213 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,924 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens