Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/terry-mao/aicodingflow/update-dedupenpx skills add Terry-Mao/AICodingFlow --skill update-dedupegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Terry-Mao/AICodingFlowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00988 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00494 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
update-dedupe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
update-dedupe
Use this skill to turn strong GitHub duplicate-closure evidence into concise
updates to the repo-local dedupe-issue companion skill.
This skill owns only the self-evolution logic: how to interpret aggregated
duplicate feedback and propose local guidance. The GitHub Actions runner owns
data collection, write-surface validation, commits, pushes, and PR creation.
When run inside GitHub Actions, .agents may be read-only. Write proposed
changes only to update-dedupe-output/; the runner applies them.
Workflow
- Read the aggregated duplicate feedback JSON provided by the runner.
- Validate that the data contains only structured duplicate evidence.
- Identify repeated duplicate clusters where two or more independent issues were closed as duplicates of the same canonical issue.
- Compare the repeated clusters with the existing
.github/skills/dedupe-issue-repo/SKILL.mdcontent when available. - Convert uncovered repeated clusters into concise repo-specific guidance.
- Write proposed local companion skill content to
update-dedupe-output/. - Stop; the runner validates and publishes the result.
Output Contract
Always write update-dedupe-output/status.json:
{
"status": "changed",
"reason": "Brief evidence summary.",
"updated_files": [".github/skills/dedupe-issue-repo/SKILL.md"]
}
Allowed statuses:
changedwhen repeated maintainer duplicate evidence should update guidanceno_changewhen evidence is insufficient or already coverederrorwhen the feedback cannot be interpreted safely
Use no_change when there is no repeated cluster. A single duplicate closure,
comments that only suggest a duplicate, title similarity, or agent-only
inference is not enough to update guidance.
For changed, write the complete replacement content for:
update-dedupe-output/dedupe-issue-repo/SKILL.md
Do not edit .agents directly.
Evidence Rules
Only learn from structured evidence supplied by the aggregation script:
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 124 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A aaf95cfc6e32
update-dedupe is a skill published in the GitHub repository Terry-Mao/AICodingFlow (165 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 988 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.