Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/terrylica/cc-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/terrylica/cc-skills/distributed-job-safetyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/terrylica/cc-skills/distributed-job-safety)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/terrylica/cc-skills/distributed-job-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/terrylica/cc-skills/distributed-job-safety/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/terrylica/cc-skills/distributed-job-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/terrylica/cc-skills/distributed-job-safety.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Rogue Agent · line 342 Skill modifies its own code, configuration, or behavior at runtime. Self-modification enables an agent to escalate privileges, disable safety constraints, or install persistent backdoors.Fix: Prevent the skill from modifying its own code, SKILL.md, or configuration files. Treat skill files as read-only at runtime.
- high Tool Misuse · line 233 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 192 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.04093 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.02047 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00819 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00409 |
Grade A, and why
distributed-job-safety scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 345 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Distributed Job Safety
Patterns and anti-patterns for concurrent job management with pueue + mise + systemd-run, learned from production failures in distributed data pipeline orchestration.
Scope: Universal principles for any pueue + mise workflow with concurrent parameterized jobs. Examples use illustrative names but the principles apply to any domain.
Prerequisite skills: devops-tools:pueue-job-orchestration, itp:mise-tasks, itp:mise-configuration
Self-Evolving Skill: This skill improves through use. If instructions are wrong, parameters drifted, or a workaround was needed — fix this file immediately, don't defer. Only update for real, reproducible issues.
The Nine Invariants
Non-negotiable rules for concurrent job safety. Violating any one causes silent data corruption or job failure.
Full formal specifications: references/concurrency-invariants.md
1. Filename Uniqueness by ALL Job Parameters
Every file path shared between concurrent jobs MUST include ALL parameters that differentiate those jobs.
WRONG: {symbol}_{start}_{end}.json # Two thresholds collide
RIGHT: {symbol}_{threshold}_{start}_{end}.json # Each job gets its own file
Test: If two pueue jobs can run simultaneously with different parameter values, those values MUST appear in every shared filename, temp directory, and lock file.
2. Verify Before Mutate (No Blind Queueing)
Before queueing jobs, check what is already running. Before deleting state, check who owns it.
# WRONG: Blind queue
for item in "${ITEMS[@]}"; do
pueue add --group mygroup -- run_job "$item" "$param"
done
# RIGHT: Check first
running=$(pueue status --json | jq '[.tasks[] | select(.status | keys[0] == "Running") | .label] | join(",")')
if echo "$running" | grep -q "${item}@${param}"; then
echo "SKIP: ${item}@${param} already running"
continue
fi
3. Idempotent File Operations (missing_ok=True)
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed 7099a4e09231
- 11d ago First seen · 345 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A eb0146612150
distributed-job-safety is a skill published in the GitHub repository terrylica/cc-skills (72 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 4,093 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
android-development
Android development with Kotlin, Jetpack Compose, and modern Android architecture. Use when building Android apps, implementing Material Design, or following Android best practices.
email-systems
Transactional email (Resend, SendGrid, SES), templates (React Email, MJML), deliverability (SPF/DKIM/DMARC), and inboxing best practices. Use when building email infrastructure, designing templates, or troubleshooting deliverability.
customer-persona-builder
Data-driven customer persona development combining market research, user behavior analysis, and segmentation frameworks. Use when creating buyer personas, ideal customer profiles (ICPs), or user archetypes.
devops-cloud
DevOps, cloud infrastructure, and platform engineering. Use when working with AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, Terraform, CI/CD pipelines, or infrastructure as code.
generic-design-system
Complete design system reference for any project - colors, typography, spacing, components, animations. Adapts to project theme and tech stack. Use when implementing UI, choosing colors, creating animations, or ensuring brand consistency. For new design systems, use ui-research skill first.
generic-code-reviewer
Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Supports any tech stack - HTML/CSS/JS, React, TypeScript, Node.js, Python, NestJS, Next.js, and more. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.