Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add testzugang/pi-plugins --skill grill-with-docsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/testzugang/pi-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/testzugang/pi-plugins/grill-with-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/testzugang/pi-plugins/grill-with-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/testzugang/pi-plugins/grill-with-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/testzugang/pi-plugins/grill-with-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/testzugang/pi-plugins/grill-with-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00475 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00190 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
grill-with-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Grill with Docs
Specialized grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallize.
Reference: Based on the grill-with-docs skill from mattpocock/skills.
Process
- Domain Awareness: Before grilling, use
scoutorreadto find existing documentation.- Look for
CONTEXT.md(glossary) anddocs/adr/(Architectural Decision Records). - If
CONTEXT-MAP.mdexists, the repo has multiple contexts; locate the relevant one.
- Look for
- Interview Relentlessly: Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one.
- Challenge against the Glossary: If a term conflicts with
CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. - Sharpen Fuzzy Language: Propose precise canonical terms (e.g., "Customer" vs "User").
- Cross-reference with Code: Verify if the code agrees with the stated plan.
- Update Inline: Update
CONTEXT.mdand create ADRs (sparingly) as decisions are made.
Documentation Formats
ADR Criteria
Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
- Hard to reverse — high cost of changing later.
- Surprising without context — future readers will wonder "why?".
- Real trade-off — there were genuine alternatives.
Red Flags
- "We can fix the terminology later" -> No, sharpen it now.
- "I'll update CONTEXT.md at the end" -> No, update it inline.
- Creating ADRs for obvious or easily reversible decisions.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 9ce4e7b3c3b6
grill-with-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository testzugang/pi-plugins (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 475 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…