Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tetherto/wdk-agent-skills --skill wdk-review-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tetherto/wdk-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tetherto/wdk-agent-skills/wdk-review-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tetherto/wdk-agent-skills/wdk-review-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tetherto/wdk-agent-skills/wdk-review-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tetherto/wdk-agent-skills/wdk-review-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tetherto/wdk-agent-skills/wdk-review-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.03464 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01732 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00693 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00346 |
Grade A, and why
wdk-review-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 338 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WDK Test Suite Review
Review the test files at the provided path (or the current project's test directory if none given). Apply all rules below.
For each violation found, report:
- Rule violated (e.g., R1, R2, etc.)
- File and line
- The offending code
- Suggested fix with corrected code
Group findings by file. After all files are reviewed, provide a summary with total violation counts per rule.
WDK Testing Standards
You are reviewing test files for a WDK (Wallet Development Kit) module. Apply the rules below to identify violations and suggest fixes.
The rules are repository-agnostic. No WDK module is a "golden reference" — apply every rule to every module equally. If existing code conflicts with a rule, the code is the candidate for change, not the rule.
Rules
R1. Assert concrete values, never properties or types
Every assertion must compare against a known, pre-computed concrete value. Flag any assertion that checks a type, pattern, range, or mere existence.
Violation:
expect(typeof result).toBe('string')
expect(fee).toBeGreaterThan(0)
expect(result).toBeDefined()
expect(result).not.toBe(null)
expect(result).toMatch(/^0x[a-f0-9]+$/)
Correct:
expect(result).toBe(EXPECTED_HASH)
expect(fee).toBe(202_000n)
If the test mocks all external dependencies, the return value is deterministic — compute and hardcode it.
Exception: toBeUndefined() is acceptable — it asserts a concrete value (undefined) and is functionally equivalent to toBe(undefined). Do not flag it.
R2. Verify mock calls with exact arguments
Every mocked dependency must be asserted with toHaveBeenCalledWith using exact expected arguments. toHaveBeenCalled (without arguments) is insufficient. Limit expect.any(), expect.objectContaining(), and expect.arrayContaining() to cases where the concrete value genuinely cannot be determined.
Violation:
expect(mockClient.getBalance).toHaveBeenCalled()
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +31 lines d84ec64d3867
- 11d ago First seen · 307 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 95fbf5d59678
wdk-review-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository tetherto/wdk-agent-skills (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 3,464 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.