Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add thalysjuvenal/advpl-specialist --skill advpl-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thalysjuvenal/advpl-specialistWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thalysjuvenal/advpl-specialist/advpl-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thalysjuvenal/advpl-specialist/advpl-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thalysjuvenal/advpl-specialist/advpl-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thalysjuvenal/advpl-specialist/advpl-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thalysjuvenal/advpl-specialist/advpl-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00139 | $0.00558 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00069 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
advpl-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
ADVPL/TLPP Code Review
This skill provides a systematic code review methodology for existing ADVPL/TLPP code, producing findings tagged with a rule ID (BP-*, PERF-*, SEC-*, MOD-*), a severity (CRITICAL/WARNING/INFO), the file/line, the issue, and the fix. It covers four review categories: best practices, performance, security, and modernization, and can map findings to the official TOTVS SonarQube quality gate.
Activate this skill when the user wants existing code inspected for quality, compliance, security, or performance issues -- e.g. before a merge, before a deploy, during an onboarding audit, or when assessing migration readiness from .prw to .tlpp. It does not cover generating new code (see advpl-code-generation), diagnosing a specific runtime/compilation error (see advpl-debugging), restructuring code without adding features (see advpl-refactoring), or performing the actual .prw to .tlpp conversion (see advpl-to-tlpp-migration).
| Reference file | Read when |
|---|---|
| reference.md | Always -- review categories, output format, severity levels, review process, rule ID prefixes |
| rules-best-practices.md | Checking RecLock/MsUnlock pairing, variable scope, area management, error handling, documentation (BP-* rules) |
| rules-performance.md | Checking Embedded SQL efficiency, loop efficiency, string operations, index usage (PERF-* rules) |
| rules-security.md | Checking SQL injection, input validation, credential exposure, sensitive data logging (SEC-* rules) |
| rules-modernization.md | Checking TLPP migration candidates, namespace usage, OOP patterns, modern UI frameworks (MOD-* rules) |
| sonarqube-rules-catalog.md | Aligning findings with the official TOTVS SonarQube ruleset (groups G1-G5, CA/BG/CS codes) |
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 20 lines · 139 tokens per session scan A e1d5358bda29
advpl-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository thalysjuvenal/advpl-specialist (186 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 139 tokens to every session and 558 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
advpl-dev
Especialista em desenvolvimento ADVPL/TLPP para o ecossistema TOTVS Protheus. Use esta skill para auxiliar com: escrita e revisão de código ADVPL e TLPP, criação de pontos de entrada (convencional e MVC), desenvolvimento de APIs REST, consultas SQL/Embedded SQL, acesso a tabelas do Protheus, criação de classes OO…
kimi-review
Skill "kimi-review" from luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform, covering kimi review, description, usage and rules.
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation.
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.