Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add the-hooman-loop/anti-slop-kit --skill deslop-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/the-hooman-loop/anti-slop-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-hooman-loop/anti-slop-kit/deslop-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-hooman-loop/anti-slop-kit/deslop-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-hooman-loop/anti-slop-kit/deslop-code.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.00941 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00470 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00188 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
deslop-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deslop code
What counts as AI slop
- Redundant or obvious comments — comments that restate what the code does line-by-line.
- Overly verbose names — e.g.
userAuthenticationTokenHandlerwhereauthTokensuffices. - Unnecessary abstractions — wrappers, helpers, or interfaces used only once.
- Excessive defensive code — try/catch or null checks that add no real safety.
- Generic filler phrases — "Here we…", "This function is responsible for…", "Note that…".
- Over-modularization — tiny one-use functions that hurt readability.
- Boilerplate that doesn't help — empty docblocks, type annotations that duplicate obvious types.
- Inconsistent style — mixed quote styles, spacing, or naming in the same file.
Respect project style (.editorconfig, ESLint, Prettier, existing patterns).
If the user or project has explicit style rules, follow those over this skill.
Removal checklist
Apply in order; re-scan after edits.
- Comments
- Remove comments that only repeat the code (e.g.
// Loop through itemsabove aforloop). - Remove or shorten generic docblocks that add no information.
- Keep comments that explain why, non-obvious contracts, or real gotchas.
- Remove comments that only repeat the code (e.g.
- Names
- Shorten verbose variables/functions to clear, idiomatic names.
- Use project naming conventions (camelCase vs snake_case, etc.).
- Structure
- Inline one-off helpers used in a single place if it improves readability.
- Remove unused parameters, imports, and dead code.
- Prefer language idioms over step-by-step code (
.map/.filtervs manual loops where idiomatic).
- Defensive code
- Remove try/catch that only rethrows or logs without adding value.
- Remove redundant null/undefined checks that can't occur in context.
- Style
- One consistent quote style per file.
- Consistent spacing and line length (match project or 80/100/120).
- No trailing whitespace or unnecessary blank lines.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 76 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 65428a53d70f
deslop-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository the-hooman-loop/anti-slop-kit (4 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 941 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.