Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to the-sid-dani/second-brain-os. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/the-sid-dani/second-brain-os/main/.agents/skills/codebase-design/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/the-sid-dani/second-brain-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-sid-dani/second-brain-os/codebase-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-sid-dani/second-brain-os/codebase-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-sid-dani/second-brain-os/codebase-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-sid-dani/second-brain-os/codebase-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-sid-dani/second-brain-os/codebase-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.01351 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00540 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to codebase-design — 26 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codebase Design
Design deep modules: a lot of behaviour behind a small interface, placed at a clean seam, testable through that interface. Use this language and these principles wherever code is being designed or restructured. The aim is leverage for callers, locality for maintainers, and testability for everyone.
Glossary
Use these terms exactly — don't substitute "component," "service," "API," or "boundary." Consistent language is the whole point.
Module — anything with an interface and an implementation. Deliberately scale-agnostic: a function, class, package, or tier-spanning slice. Avoid: unit, component, service.
Interface — everything a caller must know to use the module correctly: the type signature, but also invariants, ordering constraints, error modes, required configuration, and performance characteristics. Avoid: API, signature (too narrow — they refer only to the type-level surface).
Implementation — what's inside a module, its body of code. Distinct from Adapter: a thing can be a small adapter with a large implementation (a Postgres repo) or a large adapter with a small implementation (an in-memory fake). Reach for "adapter" when the seam is the topic; "implementation" otherwise.
Depth — leverage at the interface: the amount of behaviour a caller (or test) can exercise per unit of interface they have to learn. A module is deep when a large amount of behaviour sits behind a small interface, shallow when the interface is nearly as complex as the implementation.
Seam (Michael Feathers) — a place where you can alter behaviour without editing in that place; the location at which a module's interface lives. Where to put the seam is its own design decision, distinct from what goes behind it. Avoid: boundary (overloaded with DDD's bounded context).
Adapter — a concrete thing that satisfies an interface at a seam. Describes role (what slot it fills), not substance (what's inside).
Leverage — what callers get from depth: more capability per unit of interface they learn. One implementation pays back across N call sites and M tests.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 115 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A a8d50abac5a4
codebase-design is a skill published in the GitHub repository the-sid-dani/second-brain-os (3 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,351 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to codebase-design, differing in 26 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-qa
A quality-assurance procedure that adds or updates tests and a repair guide whenever a software component changes. Quality assurance means checking that software still works and can be fixed later.
tt
Quality gate immediately after building: prove that what was just built actually works, while the context is still hot. Six steps: scope what changed, run live on real data, break it on purpose, show a counter or log proving it ran, root-cause any failure and re-run, then a verdict with evidence. Only a green verdict…
local-fb-alpha
A comment-analysis workflow that extracts links and ideas from Anton’s Facebook posts, fetches each resource, and tests it against an existing solution.
red-first-review
Review someone else's pull request by measuring which of its own guards its own test suite actually catches, via a small mutation matrix. Use when reviewing a PR, checking whether a regression test is real, or asked 'is this change actually tested?', 'does this test do anything', 'mutation test this'.
corpus-bench
Verify someone else's code fix against your own live corpora (agent transcripts, sessions, memory files) before trusting or merging it. Use when an external PR or patch touches how transcripts, sessions or agent memory are read. Triggers: /corpus-bench, run it on our corpus, verify the fix on our transcripts, corpus…
gemini
Use Gemini as a third external reviewer alongside two other vendors: diff review with an APPROVE or REQUESTCHANGES verdict, and QA-breaker duty in the post-build test ritual. Headless over REST with a CLI fallback, and verdicts go to a shared usage journal. Triggers: "/gemini review", "gemini opinion on this diff".