Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add The-Utopia-Studio/skills --skill ab-test-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/The-Utopia-Studio/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-utopia-studio/skills/ab-test-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-utopia-studio/skills/ab-test-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-utopia-studio/skills/ab-test-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-utopia-studio/skills/ab-test-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-utopia-studio/skills/ab-test-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00879 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00352 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
ab-test-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to ab-test-analysis — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
A/B Test Analysis
Evaluate A/B test results with statistical rigor and translate findings into clear product decisions.
Context
You are analyzing A/B test results for $ARGUMENTS.
If the user provides data files (CSV, Excel, or analytics exports), read and analyze them directly. Generate Python scripts for statistical calculations when needed.
Instructions
-
Understand the experiment:
- What was the hypothesis?
- What was changed (the variant)?
- What is the primary metric? Any guardrail metrics?
- How long did the test run?
- What is the traffic split?
-
Validate the test setup:
- Sample size: Is the sample large enough for the expected effect size?
- Use the formula: n = (Z²α/2 × 2 × p × (1-p)) / MDE²
- Flag if the test is underpowered (<80% power)
- Duration: Did the test run for at least 1-2 full business cycles?
- Randomization: Any evidence of sample ratio mismatch (SRM)?
- Novelty/primacy effects: Was there enough time to wash out initial behavior changes?
- Sample size: Is the sample large enough for the expected effect size?
-
Calculate statistical significance:
- Conversion rate for control and variant
- Relative lift: (variant - control) / control × 100
- p-value: Using a two-tailed z-test or chi-squared test
- Confidence interval: 95% CI for the difference
- Statistical significance: Is p < 0.05?
- Practical significance: Is the lift meaningful for the business?
If the user provides raw data, generate and run a Python script to calculate these.
-
Check guardrail metrics:
- Did any guardrail metrics (revenue, engagement, page load time) degrade?
- A winning primary metric with degraded guardrails may not be a true win
-
Interpret results:
Outcome Recommendation Significant positive lift, no guardrail issues Ship it — roll out to 100% Significant positive lift, guardrail concerns Investigate — understand trade-offs before shipping Not significant, positive trend Extend the test — need more data or larger effect Not significant, flat Stop the test — no meaningful difference detected Significant negative lift Don't ship — revert to control, analyze why
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 83 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 9956966671d6
ab-test-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository The-Utopia-Studio/skills (7 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 879 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to ab-test-analysis, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
github
When the user wants to use GitHub for SEO, parasite SEO, GEO, open source marketing, README optimization, or curated Awesome lists. Also use when the user mentions "GitHub," "GitHub SEO," "GitHub parasite SEO," "GitHub GEO," "awesome list," "GitHub README," "profile README," "pinned repositories," "Trending,"…
xml-sitemap
When the user wants to create, audit, or optimize sitemap.xml. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "sitemap.xml," "sitemap index," "lastmod," "changefreq," "priority," "URL discovery," "URL discovery for search engines," "single source of truth," "URL config," "unify sitemap IndexNow," or "reduce duplicate…
google-ads
When the user wants to set up, optimize, or manage Google Ads campaigns. Also use when the user mentions "Google Ads," "Google Search Ads," "PPC," "SEM," "PMF testing with ads," "test product-market fit," "Responsive Search Ads," "RSA," "Performance Max," "Quality Score," "keyword bidding," or "Google Display/YouTube…
content-strategy
When the user wants to plan content for SEO, create content calendar, or build topic clusters. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "content plan," "topic clusters," "pillar content," "pillar page," "cluster articles," "editorial calendar," "content hub," "content planning," "content clusters," "topic…
robots-txt
When the user wants to configure, audit, or optimize robots.txt. Also use when the user mentions "robots.txt," "crawler rules," "block crawlers," "AI crawlers," "GPTBot," "allow/disallow," "disallow path," "crawl directives," "user-agent," "block Googlebot," "fix robots.txt," "robots.txt blocking," or "search engine…
canonical-tag
When the user wants to configure canonical URLs, fix duplicate content, or consolidate URL signals. Also use when the user mentions "canonical," "canonical URL," "duplicate content," "duplicate content fix," "preferred URL," or "URL consolidation." For GSC duplicates, use google-search-console.