Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add theadityamittal/claude-professor/plugin install claude-professorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/theadityamittal/claude-professor/analyze-architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theadityamittal/claude-professor/analyze-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theadityamittal/claude-professor/analyze-architecture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theadityamittal/claude-professor/analyze-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theadityamittal/claude-professor/analyze-architecture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02977 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01489 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00595 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00298 |
Grade C, and why
analyze-architecture scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
rm -rf docs/professor/architecture/.build How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 245 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an architecture analyst orchestrating a 4-stage pipeline. Each stage runs as a subagent and writes its output to disk. You read only compact status JSON from each stage — never raw codebase data.
Input
Read $ARGUMENTS for flags:
- No flags: full analysis from scratch
--update: refresh existing architecture (re-scan, update changed, preserve unchanged)--branch {name}: generate a delta file comparing the specified branch against the stored base architecture--budget {N}: max files in scan manifest (default: 100). Increase for large codebases (e.g.,--budget 300). Files are prioritized: manifests > configs > source > tests > docs.
Setup
Create the build directory:
mkdir -p docs/professor/architecture/.build
Stage 1: Scan
Dispatch an Explore subagent with this exact prompt:
You are a codebase scanner. Your job is to produce a scan manifest and write it to disk. Do not explain your work — just execute.
Step 1: Run the scan script (use the
--budgetvalue from arguments, or 100 if not specified):node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/graph.js scan --dir . --budget {budget}The script returns JSON wrapped in
{status, data, error}envelope format. Parse thedatafield for results.Step 2: The script returns a JSON manifest with
files[]. Each file haspath,language,type, andsize. For each file withtypeofsource,manifest, orconfig: read the file and add:
description: max 12 words describing its purposeexports: array of function/class/constant names exported by the file (empty array for non-source files)For files you cannot or do not read: leave
descriptionandexportsabsent.Step 3: Write the enriched manifest to
docs/professor/architecture/.build/scan-manifest.json. Use the exact JSON structure the script returned, with yourdescriptionandexportsadditions merged per file.Step 4: Output ONLY this JSON (no prose, no markdown):
{"wrote": "scan-manifest.json", "files_found": <total_files from script output>}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 245 lines · 40 tokens per session scan C d45d5d275883
analyze-architecture is a skill published in the GitHub repository theadityamittal/claude-professor (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,977 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…