codehub-impact-analysis

codehub-impact-analysis is a skill for Claude Code from theagenticguy/opencodehub. It costs 58 tokens per session (1,529 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of opencodehub-impact-analysis, Apache-2.0.

A code change impact checker that maps what depends on a function, class, property, API route, or dependency. An API route is a web address that software uses to request data or actions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess whether a change is safe, find code that uses a symbol, inspect API and response-shape effects, review dependency changes, and relate the current diff to affected flows.
Why use it?
It shows the likely blast radius of a change, helping you find affected callers, consumers, routes, and dependencies before editing or merging code.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the opencodehub plugin — 7 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess whether a change is safe, find code that uses a symbol, inspect API and response-shape effects, review dependency changes, and relate the current diff to affected flows.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/codehub-impact-analysis
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add theagenticguy/opencodehub --skill codehub-impact-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theagenticguy/opencodehub

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install opencodehub, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 7 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for codehub-impact-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/codehub-impact-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/codehub-impact-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/codehub-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/codehub-impact-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for codehub-impact-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/codehub-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/codehub-impact-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 58 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,529 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00058 $0.01529
Opus 5.5 $0.00023 $0.00612
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00306
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00153

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 42916cf960c0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codehub-impact-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to opencodehub-impact-analysis — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/opencodehub/skills/codehub-impact-analysis/SKILL.md · 152 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Impact Analysis with OpenCodeHub

When to Use

  • "Is it safe to change this function?"
  • "What will break if I modify X?"
  • "Show me the blast radius."
  • "Who uses this code?"
  • Before committing or merging a non-trivial change.

Decision Tree

Is the target a symbol (function, class, method, property)?
  └─ yes → mcp__codehub__impact
Is the target an HTTP route or API endpoint?
  └─ yes → mcp__codehub__api_impact + mcp__codehub__route_map
Is the change a response-shape edit on a route?
  └─ yes → mcp__codehub__shape_check (find consumer key-access mismatches)
Is the target a dependency version bump?
  └─ yes → mcp__codehub__dependencies + mcp__codehub__license_audit
Want to see what the working tree currently touches?
  └─ yes → mcp__codehub__detect_changes

Workflow

1. mcp__codehub__impact({ name, direction: "upstream", repo })  → Dependents of the target
2. Read confidenceBreakdown                                          → Trust the confirmed count
3. If HTTP-adjacent: mcp__codehub__api_impact + shape_check      → Route + shape mismatches
4. mcp__codehub__detect_changes                                  → Map the current diff to flows
5. Assess risk tier and write the summary

If the context envelope warns the index is stale, run codehub analyze first — stale impact results are worse than no impact results.

Checklist

- [ ] mcp__codehub__impact({ name, direction: "upstream", repo })
- [ ] Review byDepth.d1 first — these WILL BREAK
- [ ] Read confidenceBreakdown; demand confirmed >= heuristic for destructive calls
- [ ] Filter to confidence >= 0.9 if the target is load-bearing (auth, payments, data integrity)
- [ ] If target is a Route: mcp__codehub__api_impact + mcp__codehub__shape_check
- [ ] mcp__codehub__detect_changes to map the current diff to affected processes
- [ ] Produce a risk tier and a one-paragraph summary

Understanding impact output

Risk levels map to blast-radius tiers:

Depth Risk Level Meaning
d=1 WILL BREAK Direct callers / importers / overrides
d=2 LIKELY AFFECTED One hop through d=1
d=3 MAY NEED TESTING Two hops — transitive effects

Read the full file on GitHub · 152 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 152 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 42916cf960c0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codehub-impact-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository theagenticguy/opencodehub (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,529 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to opencodehub-impact-analysis, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens