opencodehub: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/opencodehub-impact-analysis/SKILL.md

opencodehub-impact-analysis is a skill for Claude Code from theagenticguy/opencodehub. It costs 59 tokens per session (1,530 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A code-impact analysis workflow that maps what depends on a function, class, property, route, API response, or dependency version before it is changed.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before editing or merging non-trivial code, changing an HTTP endpoint, altering a response shape, or upgrading a dependency.
Why use it?
It shows the likely blast radius of a change, including affected callers, API consumers, routes, and dependency or licence concerns.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is theagenticguy/opencodehub's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on opencodehub itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything opencodehub configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to theagenticguy/opencodehub. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/theagenticguy/opencodehub/main/.claude/skills/opencodehub-impact-analysis/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theagenticguy/opencodehub

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for opencodehub-impact-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/opencodehub-impact-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/opencodehub-impact-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/opencodehub-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/opencodehub-impact-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for opencodehub-impact-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/opencodehub-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/opencodehub-impact-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 59 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,530 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00059 $0.01530
Opus 5.5 $0.00024 $0.00612
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00306
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00153

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 5aa16236cfa5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

opencodehub-impact-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

.claude/skills/opencodehub-impact-analysis/SKILL.md · 152 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Impact Analysis with OpenCodeHub

When to Use

  • "Is it safe to change this function?"
  • "What will break if I modify X?"
  • "Show me the blast radius."
  • "Who uses this code?"
  • Before committing or merging a non-trivial change.

Decision Tree

Is the target a symbol (function, class, method, property)?
  └─ yes → mcp__codehub__impact
Is the target an HTTP route or API endpoint?
  └─ yes → mcp__codehub__api_impact + mcp__codehub__route_map
Is the change a response-shape edit on a route?
  └─ yes → mcp__codehub__shape_check (find consumer key-access mismatches)
Is the target a dependency version bump?
  └─ yes → mcp__codehub__dependencies + mcp__codehub__license_audit
Want to see what the working tree currently touches?
  └─ yes → mcp__codehub__detect_changes

Workflow

1. mcp__codehub__impact({ name, direction: "upstream", repo })  → Dependents of the target
2. Read confidenceBreakdown                                          → Trust the confirmed count
3. If HTTP-adjacent: mcp__codehub__api_impact + shape_check      → Route + shape mismatches
4. mcp__codehub__detect_changes                                  → Map the current diff to flows
5. Assess risk tier and write the summary

If the context envelope warns the index is stale, run codehub analyze first — stale impact results are worse than no impact results.

Checklist

- [ ] mcp__codehub__impact({ name, direction: "upstream", repo })
- [ ] Review byDepth.d1 first — these WILL BREAK
- [ ] Read confidenceBreakdown; demand confirmed >= heuristic for destructive calls
- [ ] Filter to confidence >= 0.9 if the target is load-bearing (auth, payments, data integrity)
- [ ] If target is a Route: mcp__codehub__api_impact + mcp__codehub__shape_check
- [ ] mcp__codehub__detect_changes to map the current diff to affected processes
- [ ] Produce a risk tier and a one-paragraph summary

Understanding impact output

Risk levels map to blast-radius tiers:

Depth Risk Level Meaning
d=1 WILL BREAK Direct callers / importers / overrides
d=2 LIKELY AFFECTED One hop through d=1
d=3 MAY NEED TESTING Two hops — transitive effects

Read the full file on GitHub · 152 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 152 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 5aa16236cfa5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

opencodehub-impact-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository theagenticguy/opencodehub (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,530 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.

open-metadata/OpenMetadata · 37 tokens

log-error-digest

Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…

zebbern/claude-code-guide · 71 tokens

cwv-optimizer

Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…

adobe/skills · 112 tokens

incident-response-incident-response

Coordinate production incident triage, mitigation, investigation, recovery, and follow-up. Use when responding to outages or other incidents that require structured operational coordination.

rmyndharis/antigravity-skills · 36 tokens

ci-fixer

CI failures - read error, minimal fix, verify.

sipyourdrink-ltd/bernstein · 15 tokens

diagnosing-missing-recordings

Diagnoses why a session recording is missing or was not captured. Use when a user asks why a session has no replay, why recordings aren't appearing, or wants to troubleshoot session replay capture issues for a specific session ID or across their project. Covers SDK diagnostic signals, project settings, sampling…

PostHog/posthog · 76 tokens