Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft --skill ecosystem-toolsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ecosystem-tools)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ecosystem-tools"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ecosystem-tools/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ecosystem-tools"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ecosystem-tools.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00350 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00175 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
ecosystem-tools scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Ecosystem Tools
Curated third-party Claude Code tools that complement Claude Craft's native token/context stack (RTK,
context: fork skills, compaction hooks). None are bundled — they are documented with activation
recipes and license caveats.
See @docs/ECOSYSTEM.md for the full catalogue, licenses, and .mcp.json snippets.
Quick reference
| Tool | License | Use it for | Rec |
|---|---|---|---|
| caveman | MIT | Compress agent output ~65% | ✅ Integrate |
| code-review-graph | MIT | AST graph → read only the blast radius on review | ✅ Integrate |
| token-savior | MIT | Symbol index + Bash output compaction (−80%), RTK alternative | ✅ Integrate |
| claude-token-efficient | MIT | Anti-verbosity CLAUDE.md drop-in | ✅ Integrate |
| context-mode | ELv2 | Output sandboxing — license blocks commercial redistribution | 🔶 Reference |
| claude-context | MIT | Semantic search; needs a Milvus/Zilliz vector DB | 🔶 Reference |
Audit the source and pin a version before enabling any third-party MCP server or skill — see
@.claude/rules/11-security.mdand@docs/MCP.md#security.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 27 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 7a6df79e1648
ecosystem-tools is a skill published in the GitHub repository TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft (105 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 350 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
generic-fullstack-code-reviewer
Review full-stack code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, input validation, GPU-accelerated animations, and design system consistency. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
generic-code-reviewer
Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Supports any tech stack - HTML/CSS/JS, React, TypeScript, Node.js, Python, NestJS, Next.js, and more. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
audit-comment-residue
Classify code comments for four residue shapes. History narration ("used to… now…"), plan/session references ("Task 2 replaces the old…", "in this PR"), conversational antecedents ("per your request", "as you asked"), and ticket/PR/branch back-references a future reader will never see. Emitting Tier 1 (remove) and…
review
Orchestrated REVIEW phase — fan out parallel, read-only reviewers over a diff (scope-detected audit skills AND independent agent lenses), then consolidate into one severity-ranked verdict. Use for a full pre-ship review, "review/validate this PR", or "spawn agents to review". Don't use to implement fixes (use /build…
visual-review
Render a GitHub Pull Request diff as a self-contained HTML page where each changed hunk is annotated with a software-principle explanation and a suggested simplification. Use when the user wants to review a PR visually, generate an HTML/visual diff report, or see PR feedback linked to principles (e.g. an unnecessary…
code-review-architecture
Architecture-focused code review covering hexagonal boundary violations, DDD anti-patterns, CQRS misuse, and microservices coupling issues. Applied in addition to the language-specific review skill when architecture markers are detected. Invoked when reviewing hexagonal architectures, DDD patterns, or microservices…