Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add thebtf/pr-review-mcp --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thebtf/pr-review-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thebtf/pr-review-mcp/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thebtf/pr-review-mcp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thebtf/pr-review-mcp/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thebtf/pr-review-mcp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thebtf/pr-review-mcp/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.01291 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00646 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00258 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review Orchestrator
Autonomous multi-agent PR review: invoke AI agents, await their reviews, process all findings, verify build.
How It Works
This skill calls the review MCP prompt from the pr server. The prompt dynamically builds an orchestration plan with pre-fetched PR data (summary, work status, agent config). The plan includes:
- Delegation instructions — create tracking tasks, spawn a background sonnet agent
- Full orchestrator workflow — escape check, invoke, await, spawn workers, build/test
- Worker templates — for parallel comment processing
You don't need to understand the internals — just call the prompt and follow its instructions.
Invocation
/pr:review — Context-dependent (see below)
/pr:review 42 — PR #42 in current repo
/pr:review owner/repo#5 — Specific PR in any repo
/pr:review https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123 — Full URL
No-argument behavior depends on current branch:
- Feature branch → auto-detects the PR for this branch (single PR mode)
- Main/master → processes all open PRs with unresolved review comments (batch mode, up to 20)
- Main/master + no PRs with comments → processes first 5 open PRs
Workflow
Step 1: Call the MCP Prompt
Use the `review` prompt from the `pr` MCP server, passing $ARGUMENTS as the `pr` parameter.
The prompt returns a complete orchestration plan. It has two sections:
- DELEGATION — instructions for YOU (the parent agent)
- ORCHESTRATOR PROMPT — instructions for the background agent you'll spawn
Step 2: Follow the Delegation Plan
The delegation section tells you to:
-
Create 4 tracking tasks via TaskCreate:
- Preflight checks
- Wait for AI agent reviews
- Process review comments
- Build and test
-
Spawn a background agent via
Agent(model: "sonnet", run_in_background: true)with the ORCHESTRATOR PROMPT section as its prompt. -
Monitor progress — when the background agent sends progress notifications, call
pr_progress_checkand update your tasks accordingly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 116 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 5ba27e4eb029
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository thebtf/pr-review-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 1,291 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…