avoid-eval

avoid-eval is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist. It costs 48 tokens per session (455 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review guide for preventing eval(), a JavaScript function that executes text as code, and other unsafe dynamic code execution. It examines both source code and what runs in the browser.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review scripts, client components, bundles, and runtime behavior for unsafe dynamic execution.
Why use it?
It helps locate security and runtime problems caused by turning untrusted or changeable text into executable code. Checking the browser path can reveal issues hidden by source-only inspection.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review scripts, client components, bundles, and runtime behavior for unsafe dynamic execution.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/thedaviddias/front-end-checklist/avoid-eval
About the project

Front-End Checklist is a collection of front-end web development rules organized as a practical review and quality workflow for people and AI agents. Developers use it to audit projects and pull requests, check implementation details, and find guidance for remediation and verification. The catalogue entries provide skills, instructions, MCP tools, and a plugin for using the checklist in agent workflows.

thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist · 74,548 stars · on GitHub · frontendchecklist.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist --skill avoid-eval
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for avoid-eval

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thedaviddias/front-end-checklist/avoid-eval/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thedaviddias/front-end-checklist/avoid-eval)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thedaviddias/front-end-checklist/avoid-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thedaviddias/front-end-checklist/avoid-eval/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for avoid-eval

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thedaviddias/front-end-checklist/avoid-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thedaviddias/front-end-checklist/avoid-eval.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 48 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 455 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00048 $0.00455
Opus 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00182
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00091
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00046

Measured 18d ago against content hash 5c668b163132, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

avoid-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 18d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/avoid-eval/SKILL.md · 46 lines

What it actually says

Never use eval() or unsafe dynamic code execution

eval() and its equivalents are the root cause of some of the most severe XSS vulnerabilities. If any user-controlled string reaches eval(), an attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in your users' browsers — stealing sessions, making requests as the user, or redirecting to malicious sites. Content Security Policy (CSP) blocks eval() but not new Function(), and there is never a legitimate use case that can't be solved without it.

Quick Reference

  • eval() executes arbitrary strings as code — any user input passed to it is a critical security hole
  • new Function() is equally dangerous and not caught by CSP eval restrictions
  • setTimeout('code', delay) and setInterval('code', delay) also evaluate strings — use function references instead
  • Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() for parsing JSON

Check

Search this codebase for any use of eval(), new Function(), or setTimeout/setInterval with string arguments.

Fix

Replace eval() calls with safe alternatives: JSON.parse for data, object lookups for dynamic dispatch, and Function references for timers.

Explain

Explain why eval() is dangerous, how it enables XSS attacks, and what safe alternatives exist for each use case.

Code Review

Review scripts, client components, and browser execution paths related to Never use eval() or unsafe dynamic code execution. Flag exact imports, event handlers, runtime side effects, or blocking operations that violate the rule, and state how the change should be verified in the browser.


For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md.

Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/javascript/avoid-eval

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 18d ago Changed 5c668b163132
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 627a235f443e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

avoid-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist (74,548 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 455 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.