Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add theexperiencecompany/gaia --skill receiving-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theexperiencecompany/gaiaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/theexperiencecompany/gaia/receiving-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theexperiencecompany/gaia/receiving-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theexperiencecompany/gaia/receiving-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theexperiencecompany/gaia/receiving-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theexperiencecompany/gaia/receiving-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01505 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00602 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00301 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00151 |
Grade A, and why
receiving-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 227 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A a4380898f3ca
receiving-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository theexperiencecompany/gaia (324 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,505 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
security-audit
Answer security questions about code, review a file or change for vulnerabilities, or run a full multi-agent audit of a codebase with a coverage ledger and independently verified findings.
pr-watch
Event-driven GitHub PR watching. Use when the owner wants to be kept on top of pull requests: re-review a person's PRs whenever they change, follow up on any PR the owner has already reviewed, react when a review is requested from the owner, or note merges, closes and submitted or dismissed reviews, without polling…
review-preflight
Review tooling for a PR: review-preflight prints REVIEW.md's criteria and the PR's live gate state before a review; ci-triage maps a PR's failing checks to already-filed issues.
factory-rereview
Re-review a pull request after a push — reconcile the previous review against the new commits, look for new defects the push introduced, then a fresh pass over the whole PR, and finish with a verdict on the PR.
understand-pr
Review a PR the way a seasoned maintainer would — build an independent model before seeing the diff, investigate the implementation and history, verify material claims, and return a concise briefing. Use for any PR review, self-review, or re-review.
factory-gitlab-review
Review a GitLab merge request for a Factory work item using brokered source-control tools.