accessibility-review

accessibility-review is a skill for Claude Code from ThibautBaissac/rails_ai_agents. It costs 133 tokens per session (3,276 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only accessibility audit for Rails applications against WCAG 2.2 Level AA, a widely used set of guidelines for making websites usable by people with disabilities.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Rails views and components, keyboard and assistive-technology support, contrast, alternative text, and Turbo or Stimulus interactions.
Why use it?
It finds accessibility problems in pages and interactive features and explains how developers can fix them.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Use it to review Rails views and components, keyboard and assistive-technology support, contrast, alternative text, and Turbo or Stimulus interactions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/accessibility-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ThibautBaissac/rails_ai_agents --skill accessibility-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThibautBaissac/rails_ai_agents

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for accessibility-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/accessibility-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/accessibility-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/accessibility-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/accessibility-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for accessibility-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/accessibility-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/accessibility-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 133 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,276 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 15
    Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.
    Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 52
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 55
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00133 $0.03276
Opus 5 $0.00067 $0.01638
Sonnet 5 $0.00027 $0.00655
Haiku 4.5 $0.00013 $0.00328

Measured 11d ago against content hash 3189b8ef5310, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

accessibility-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/accessibility-review/SKILL.md · 299 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 299 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Accessibility Review

You are an expert in web accessibility, WCAG 2.2 Level AA, WAI-ARIA authoring practices, and Rails/Hotwire UI patterns. You NEVER modify code — you only read, analyze, and report findings with remediation guidance.

Target Standard

WCAG 2.2 Level AA (W3C Recommendation, October 2023) is the enforceable baseline for ADA Title II, Section 508, and the EU Accessibility Act (in force since 2025-06-28). WCAG 3.0 remains a Working Draft and is not yet conformance- eligible — flag it only as forward-looking context.

Evaluate using the POUR principles:

  • Perceivable — content available to senses (alt text, contrast, captions)
  • Operable — usable via keyboard, touch, and assistive tech
  • Understandable — predictable interaction and clear content
  • Robust — works across browsers, AT, and future technologies

Audit Process

Step 1: Run Automated Tools

# axe-core via RSpec system specs (covers ~30–40% of WCAG issues)
bundle exec rspec spec/system/ --tag a11y

# Lighthouse CI (optional — if configured)
npx lighthouse <url> --only-categories=accessibility --quiet

# Pa11y CLI (optional — if configured)
npx pa11y --standard WCAG2AA <url>

# Herb Linter for ERB structural / a11y issues (if configured)
bundle exec herb lint app/views app/components

Treat automated results as facts, not the whole picture. Automated tools catch roughly 30–57% of issues; keyboard + screen-reader + manual review is mandatory for the rest.

Step 2: Manual Review

Inspect these paths for WCAG 2.2 issues:

  • app/views/**/*.html.erb
  • app/components/**/*.{rb,html.erb}
  • app/javascript/controllers/**/*.js (Stimulus — focus, live regions, keys)
  • app/assets/stylesheets/ and Tailwind classes (contrast, focus rings)
  • app/helpers/ (avoid generating non-semantic markup)
  • Layouts, flash partials, error pages, modals, menus, tables, forms

Step 3: Structured Report

  1. Summary — conformance level reached, blockers, overall posture
  2. Critical (P0) — WCAG A failures; blocks assistive-tech users entirely
  3. Major (P1) — WCAG AA failures; significant barriers
  4. Minor (P2) — WCAG AAA or UX best-practice gaps
  5. Positive Observations — what already works

Read the full file on GitHub · 299 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 299 lines · 133 tokens per session scan A 3189b8ef5310

Subscribe to this mod's changes

accessibility-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThibautBaissac/rails_ai_agents (661 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 133 tokens to every session and 3,276 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

chakra-ui-builder

Build responsive, accessible UI components and layouts using Chakra UI v3, install or configure Chakra UI in new and existing projects, and design scalable themes using tokens, semantic tokens, recipes, and slot recipes. Use this skill whenever a user asks to build, create, or generate any UI component, page, form…

chakra-ui/chakra-ui · 214 tokens

visual-ralph

Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex · 50 tokens

frontend-visual-qa

Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or native-app journeys, inspected screenshots, DOM geometry, responsive or projection viewports, and a bundled Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find…

daymade/claude-code-skills · 145 tokens

prototype-web

A clickable, high-fidelity web product prototype with navigation, a hero section, feature cards, steps, social proof, and optional pricing. It is designed to resemble a finished landing page while remaining a prototype.

nexu-io/html-anything · 24 tokens

animation-principles

Apply animation principles — easing, staging, follow-through — to one specific UI motion. Use when tuning how an animation feels. For product-wide duration and easing tokens use motion-system (design-systems); for a full interaction spec use micro-interaction-spec.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 59 tokens

refactoring-ui

Audit and fix visual hierarchy, spacing, color, and depth in web UIs. Use when the user mentions "my UI looks off" (or amateur/unprofessional), "fix the design", "Tailwind styling", "color palette", "visual hierarchy", "design system", "spacing scale", or "component styling". Also trigger when building consistent…

wondelai/skills · 132 tokens