Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tikoci/rosetta/verify-tasknpx skills add tikoci/rosetta --skill verify-taskgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tikoci/rosettaWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.01423 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00711 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00285 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
verify-task scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Task
Closes the loop between a work item's claimed acceptance and what's actually proven. Reads
the V-* rows cited in the issue's ## Validation section (per the work-item template),
looks each up in VALIDATION.md, runs the proof, reports green/red.
When to use
- A PR is about to claim
Closes #Nand you want to confirm the cited validation rows are actually green. - A user asks "is this issue really finished?"
When NOT to use
- For an issue that cites no
V-*rows (pure-doc work). There's nothing to run. - As a substitute for code review.
Procedure
-
Resolve the work item. An issue number →
gh issue view <n>and pull theV-*IDs from its## Validationsection — falling back to scanning acceptance bullets for older issues that predate the template (also check any archivedtasks/done/T-*.mdfile the issue names as its full spec).T-0037→ readtasks/T-0037-npm-prerelease-dist-tag-channel.mdfrontmatter directly (the one still-in-flight file-based task). -
Look up each
V-*inVALIDATION.md. Pull theProven by,Status, andTracked bycolumns. This tells you whether the invariant is already enforced, non-blocking, CI-only, or still a declared gap. -
Run the proof.
Run
make verify— it covers V-typecheck, V-lint, V-unit, V-tool-registry, and V-retrieval-floor in one command (requires a populated DB). It runsbun test src/mcp-contract.test.tswithoutROSETTA_REAL_DB_TESTS=1, so the real-DB blocks behind V-tool-shapes and V-tool-budget are skipped — run those separately withROSETTA_REAL_DB_TESTS=1 bun test src/mcp-contract.test.tsagainst a populated DB. For CI-only invariants (V-db-min-content, V-bunx-*) there is no local equivalent; those are only proven by a release run.For more targeted checks, map common
V-*IDs to commands:V-* ID Command V-typecheck bun run typecheckV-lint bun run lintV-unit bun testV-tool-registry bun test src/mcp-contract.test.ts(Block A, always runs)V-tool-shapes ROSETTA_REAL_DB_TESTS=1 bun test src/mcp-contract.test.ts(Block C, needs populated DB)V-tool-budget ROSETTA_REAL_DB_TESTS=1 bun test src/mcp-contract.test.ts(Block B, needs populated DB)V-retrieval-floor bun run src/eval/retrieval.tsV-retrieval-self bun run src/eval/self-supervised.tsV-canonicalize bun test src/canonicalize.test.ts src/canonicalize.fuzz.test.tsV-classifier bun test src/classify.test.tsV-schema-roundtrip bun test src/schema-roundtrip.test.tsV-extract-videos bun test src/extract-videos.test.tsV-http-handshake bun test src/mcp-http.test.tsV-stdio-handshake bun test src/mcp-stdio-client.test.tsV-tui-mcp-parity bun test src/browse-parity.test.tsV-cli-flag-uniformity bun test src/cli-help.test.tsV-db-wipe-guard bun test src/query.test.tsV-release-structure bun test src/release.test.ts
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 98 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 59f2a672c569
verify-task is a skill published in the GitHub repository tikoci/rosetta (43 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,423 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
advisor
Interactive workflow advisor that helps you choose optimal AI primitives from agentconfig.org based on your specific workflow needs, skill level, and tooling preferences. Use when deciding which primitives to implement or how to structure your AI configuration.
add-primitive
Add or modify AI primitive definitions in the data layer with correct typing and complete metadata. Use when adding new primitives, updating descriptions, or extending primitive categories.
add-provider
Add a new AI provider to agentconfig.org's comparison system. Use when integrating a new coding assistant (e.g., Cursor, Claude Desktop, GitHub Copilot alternative) with proper type system updates, implementation data, UI components, tests, and documentation.
refresh-provider-docs
Retrieve, normalize, compare, and cite authoritative AI provider documentation to verify what agentconfig.org publishes. Use when checking whether provider config locations, hook events, skills, MCP, custom agents, or precedence claims are still accurate, when adding a provider to the compatibility index, or when…
generate-llms
Generate llms.txt and llms-full.txt files for AI agent consumption following the llmstxt.org standard. Use when updating site content that should be reflected in the llms files, or when building/deploying the site.
create-page
Create a new tutorial/content page on agentconfig.org with proper file structure, routing, and registry entry. Use when adding a new top-level page like /skills, /agents, or /mcp.