plan-design-review

plan-design-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from timurgaleev/vibestack. It costs 60 tokens per session (12,317 once invoked), scanned B, original, MIT.

An interactive review of a planned design, such as a website or app interface. It scores different design areas from 0 to 10, explains the gaps, and updates the plan.

In plain words
What is it for?
Critiquing and improving UI or UX plans in plan mode; live website audits use a separate design-review command.
Why use it?
It exposes usability and visual problems before implementation begins, when changing the plan is easier.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: allowed-tools in frontmatter, but also runs codex exec. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents; names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Good fit Critiquing and improving UI or UX plans in plan mode; live website audits use a separate design-review command.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/plan-design-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add timurgaleev/vibestack --skill plan-design-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/timurgaleev/vibestack

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for plan-design-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/plan-design-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/plan-design-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/plan-design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/plan-design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for plan-design-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/plan-design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/plan-design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 60 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 12,317 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00060 $0.12317
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.06159
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.02463
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.01232

Measured 5d ago against content hash 536b8e24c431, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

plan-design-review scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Sends data to an external URLmediumData exfiltration

A POST to an outside endpoint may be telemetry or may be exfiltration; either way the mod talks to somewhere, and you should know where.

`curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:PORT/api/reload -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"html":"$_DESIGN_DIR/design-board.html"}'`

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

`curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:PORT/api/reload -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"html":"$_DESIGN_DIR/design-board.html"}'`
skills/plan-design-review/SKILL.md · 937 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 937 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

When to invoke

Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "design critique".

Proactively suggest when the user has a plan with UI/UX components that should be reviewed before implementation.

Preamble

eval "$(~/.vibestack/bin/vibe-slug 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || SLUG="unknown"
_LEARN_FILE="${VIBESTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.vibestack}/projects/${SLUG:-unknown}/learnings.jsonl"
if [ -f "$_LEARN_FILE" ]; then
  _LEARN_COUNT=$(wc -l < "$_LEARN_FILE" 2>/dev/null | tr -d ' ')
  echo "LEARNINGS: $_LEARN_COUNT entries loaded"
  if [ "$_LEARN_COUNT" -gt 5 ] 2>/dev/null; then
    ~/.vibestack/bin/vibe-learnings-search --limit 5 2>/dev/null || true
  fi
else
  echo "LEARNINGS: none yet"
fi

{{include lib/snippets/session-host.md}}

{{include lib/snippets/decision-brief.md}}

{{include lib/snippets/working-protocols.md}}

{{include lib/snippets/state-protocols.md}}

{{include lib/snippets/scope-gate.md}}

Step 0: Detect platform and base branch

First, detect the git hosting platform from the remote URL:

git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null
  • If the URL contains "github.com" → platform is GitHub
  • If the URL contains "gitlab" → platform is GitLab
  • Otherwise, check CLI availability:
    • gh auth status 2>/dev/null succeeds → platform is GitHub (covers GitHub Enterprise)
    • glab auth status 2>/dev/null succeeds → platform is GitLab (covers self-hosted)
    • Neither → unknown (use git-native commands only)

Determine which branch this PR/MR targets, or the repo's default branch if no PR/MR exists. Use the result as "the base branch" in all subsequent steps.

If GitHub:

  1. gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName — if succeeds, use it
  2. gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name — if succeeds, use it

If GitLab:

  1. glab mr view -F json 2>/dev/null and extract the target_branch field — if succeeds, use it
  2. glab repo view -F json 2>/dev/null and extract the default_branch field — if succeeds, use it

Read the full file on GitHub · 937 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago Changed · +22 lines 536b8e24c431
  2. 9d ago First seen · 915 lines · 60 tokens per session scan B 6d4272fe1438

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan-design-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository timurgaleev/vibestack (6 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 12,317 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (sends data to an external url, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

mermaid-diagrams

Author Mermaid diagrams for architecture work — C4 context/container/component, sequence, deployment, flowchart, and state diagrams with copy-paste examples and CLI validation. Use when the user wants a text-based diagram, a diagram embedded in Markdown, or a quick architecture sketch.

ihatesea69/kiro-kit · 59 tokens

aesthetic

Create aesthetically beautiful interfaces following proven design principles. Use when building UI that needs visual polish, micro-interactions, or design system refinement.

ihatesea69/kiro-kit · 30 tokens

accessibility-audit

Audit UI for WCAG accessibility issues and fixes.

emaraschio/cursor-commands · 14 tokens

drawio-gcp

Use when the user asks for a GCP or Google Cloud architecture diagram — VPC/networking, GKE, Cloud Run, landing zone, multi-region, or any diagram built with GCP service icons. Builds with the declarative layout engine using ground-truth GCP stencils, validates (stencils/colors/nesting/geometry), runs a render-based…

ihatesea69/kiro-kit · 95 tokens

ui-styling

Create beautiful, accessible user interfaces with shadcn/ui components (built on Radix UI + Tailwind), Tailwind CSS utility-first styling, and canvas-based visual designs. Use when building user interfaces, implementing design systems, creating responsive layouts, adding accessible components (dialogs, dropdowns…

ihatesea69/kiro-kit · 90 tokens

design-review

Stress-test a plan or design against domain language, docs, and code. Ask hard questions one at a time. Update CONTEXT.md and ADRs as decisions crystallize. Use when you already have a draft plan or spec and want to find gaps before implementation.

netanelavr/dotcursor · 56 tokens