Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-toolinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tobihagemann/turboWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/review-tooling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/review-tooling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/review-tooling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/review-tooling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/review-tooling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.01637 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00818 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00327 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
review-tooling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Tooling
Detect dev tooling infrastructure and flag gaps. Analysis only. Does not install or configure tools.
Scope
Tooling review always operates at the project level since config files live at the project root. Scope parameters (diff commands, file lists) are accepted but ignored.
When called standalone, use the git repository root as the project root (fall back to the current working directory if not in a git repo).
Step 1: Detect Tooling
Search for config files in the project root and subdirectories (exclude vendored directories like node_modules/, vendor/, .build/). Classify findings into five categories:
Linters
| Config file pattern | Tool |
|---|---|
.eslintrc*, eslint.config.* |
ESLint |
biome.json, biome.jsonc |
Biome (linter + formatter) |
deno.json, deno.jsonc with lint config |
Deno lint |
.swiftlint.yml |
SwiftLint |
ruff.toml, [tool.ruff] in pyproject.toml |
Ruff |
.pylintrc, pylintrc |
Pylint |
.flake8, [flake8] in setup.cfg |
Flake8 |
.rubocop.yml |
RuboCop |
.golangci.yml, .golangci.yaml |
golangci-lint |
clippy.toml, .clippy.toml |
Clippy |
ktlint*, .editorconfig with ktlint |
ktlint |
Formatters
| Config file pattern | Tool |
|---|---|
.prettierrc*, prettier.config.* |
Prettier |
biome.json, biome.jsonc |
Biome (linter + formatter) |
deno.json, deno.jsonc with fmt config |
Deno fmt |
.swift-format, .swiftformat |
swift-format / SwiftFormat |
[tool.black] in pyproject.toml, pyproject.toml with [tool.ruff.format] |
Black / Ruff formatter |
rustfmt.toml, .rustfmt.toml |
rustfmt |
gofmt / goimports (check CI config or Makefile for usage) |
gofmt |
.clang-format |
ClangFormat |
Pre-commit Hooks
| Config file pattern | Tool |
|---|---|
.husky/ directory |
Husky |
.lintstagedrc*, lint-staged key in package.json |
lint-staged |
.pre-commit-config.yaml |
pre-commit framework |
.git/hooks/pre-commit (non-sample) |
Custom git hook |
.lefthook.yml, lefthook.yml |
Lefthook |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 153 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A f1d54a0d2ba9
review-tooling is a skill published in the GitHub repository tobihagemann/turbo (402 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,637 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-actions-gen
A guide for creating or updating GitHub Actions workflows, which are automated jobs that test, build, release, or deploy code. It first examines the real project before choosing commands, runtimes, caches, and permissions.
e2e-testing-expert
Expert guide for End-to-End (E2E) testing with Playwright, unit/integration testing with Vitest, and CI/CD automated testing pipeline setup / Panduan ahli pengujian End-to-End (E2E) dengan Playwright, pengujian unit/integrasi dengan Vitest, dan otomatisasi CI/CD.
zero-trust-secret-vault
Expert guide for Zero-Trust Secret Management (Infisical, HashiCorp Vault, Doppler), automated API key rotation, and environment security / Panduan ahli manajemen rahasia Zero-Trust, rotasi kunci API, dan keamanan variabel lingkungan.
plan-ceo-review
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Three modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Originally from Garry Tan's gstack…
ci-cd-devops-architect
Expert guide for continuous integration, deployment pipelines, Docker, Kubernetes, and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) / Panduan ahli untuk CI/CD dan infrastruktur.
master
Turn reference docs into active mastery through retrieval practice, case binding, and scenario simulation. Combines Skycak (learning science) and Chin (expertise acceleration) frameworks. Use when you want to deeply learn material, not just read it.