Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill shipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tobihagemann/turboWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/ship/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/ship.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Rogue Agent · line 12 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00963 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00481 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ship
Commit, push, and optionally create or update a PR for the current staged changes.
Task Tracking
At the start, use TaskCreate to create a task for each phase:
- Determine intent
- Branch (if needed)
- Stage unstaged changes
- Run
/commit-rulesskill - Commit
- Push (if requested)
- Create or update PR (if requested)
Step 1: Determine Intent
Detect the repository state:
- Default branch:
gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name' - Current branch name, and whether it tracks an upstream
- Whether a PR already exists for the current branch (
gh pr view)
Sample the prevailing workflow from recent default-branch history (git log --first-parent origin/<default-branch> -n 30 --pretty=%s): judge whether changes mostly land through pull requests (merge-PR commits or (#N)-suffixed squash commits) or are committed directly to the default branch.
Output a one-line summary of the detected state as text. Then use AskUserQuestion to choose how to proceed, offering these options:
- Commit, push, and create/update the PR — say "create a PR" when no PR exists for the current branch and "update the PR" when one does; on the default branch, Step 2 creates a feature branch first
- Commit and push — commit, then push to the current branch's remote
- Commit only — commit the staged changes, do not push
Recommend the option that fits this repo by listing it first and labeling it (Recommended): when the current branch already has a PR, recommend updating it; otherwise follow the prevailing workflow — recommend the PR path for a PR-based history, or commit and push for a direct-commit history.
If the user declines (chooses the free-form "Other" option or asks to abort), leave the changes staged and do not commit.
Step 2: Branch (if Needed)
If the chosen option creates a PR and the current branch is the default branch:
- Suggest a branch name based on the changes and use
AskUserQuestionto confirm or adjust - Create and switch to the new branch:
git checkout -b <branch-name>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 85 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 9ae3716c9b3d
ship is a skill published in the GitHub repository tobihagemann/turbo (402 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 963 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-pushing
Stage, commit, and push git changes with conventional commit messages. Use when user wants to commit and push changes, mentions pushing to remote, or asks to save and push their work. Also activates when user says "push changes", "commit and push", "push this", "push to github", or similar git workflow requests.
ape-commit
Defines how to write and format git commit messages. Use this skill whenever the user asks you to write, draft, suggest, or format a git commit message, summarize changes into a commit, or help stage and describe code changes. Trigger even for casual requests like "write me a commit for this" or "what should my commit…
iterate
Diverge-converge workflow: spin up N agents on isolated worktrees, each exploring a different approach to the same problem. Compare results side-by-side (with optional preview ports), pick a winner, merge it back. Use when the user says /iterate, 'try multiple approaches', 'explore different directions', or wants to…
changelog
Use when writing a changelog or release notes. Covers what belongs in one, writing for users rather than for git, semantic versioning, and documenting breaking changes so nobody is surprised.
git-workflow
Use for branching, committing, history repair, and release hygiene. Covers atomic commits, rebase versus merge, bisect, reflog recovery, and undoing mistakes safely.
git
Granular git operations with conventional commits - stage, commit, push, PR, merge. Auto-splits commits by type/scope, blocks on secrets, delegates verbose work to git-manager subagent. GitHub CLI conventions: --body-file for PR bodies, treat gh pr checks exit 8 (pending) as retry not failure, guard run-id assignment…