Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill update-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tobihagemann/turboWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/update-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/update-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/update-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/update-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/update-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.02403 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00961 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00481 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00240 |
Grade A, and why
update-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 172 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Update PR Title and Description
Read the current PR title and body, analyze what changed in the session, and draft an updated title and description that preserves the original writing style.
Step 1: Fetch Current PR
Fetch the current PR details:
gh pr view [PR_NUMBER] --json number,title,body,baseRefName,commits
Omit PR_NUMBER to auto-detect from current branch.
Step 2: Analyze the Existing Style
Before drafting, study the current title and body to identify:
- Title format — length, prefix conventions (e.g.,
feat:,fix:), capitalization - Body structure — headings, bullet points, sections, line length
- Tone — formal vs. casual, terse vs. detailed
- Content patterns — does it explain the "why", list changes, include test plans?
- Diagrams — does the body contain Mermaid code blocks (sequence, state, or other)?
- Screenshots — does the body embed uploaded images?
Step 3: Evaluate Whether an Update Is Needed
Run git fetch origin <base> so the remote ref is current before any diff below. A local branch of the same name can sit behind the remote, which puts the merge base before an already-merged pull request and pulls merged work into the description.
Read the fetched body against the current diff and list what the body leaves undescribed:
git diff origin/<base>...HEAD
Check every Mermaid diagram in the body the same way, node by node and transition by transition. A diagram that omits a state still renders, so only the code reveals its staleness.
If the body and its diagrams already describe the diff, no embedded screenshot shows a look the PR has since reverted, and the session holds no final-state capture of an added or visually changed user-facing surface that the body lacks or shows in an older state, the description is up to date. Say so, then use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task.
If what the body leaves undescribed is only trivial (formatting, typos, config-only), the body embeds no such screenshot, and the session holds no such capture, say so, then use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task. Proceed when the body omits, misstates, or still describes behavior the diff no longer contains.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +2 lines d0b2422983d0
- 7d ago Changed b3bde9452d15
- 19d ago Changed d18caad3260d
- 23d ago Changed · +37 lines c3d9b559ab20
- 28d ago Changed · +2 lines 2102d96ffd17
- 1mo ago First seen · 131 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A a4c40e6ef82b
update-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository tobihagemann/turbo (416 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 2,403 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
antigravity-maintainer-batch-release
Run protected AAS maintainer sweeps, PR merge batches, canonical sync, Core preview checks, and scripted releases. Use for repository maintenance, main alignment, CLI/MCP/Workbench changes, or release work; not ordinary contribution tasks.
ape-commit
Defines how to write and format git commit messages. Use this skill whenever the user asks you to write, draft, suggest, or format a git commit message, summarize changes into a commit, or help stage and describe code changes. Trigger even for casual requests like "write me a commit for this" or "what should my commit…
git-workflow
Use for branching, committing, history repair, and release hygiene. Covers atomic commits, rebase versus merge, bisect, reflog recovery, and undoing mistakes safely. Trigger on "undo my last commit", "i messed up a rebase", "squash these commits", "find which commit broke this". Do not use for pipeline and deploy…
changelog
Use when writing a changelog or release notes. Covers what belongs in one, writing for users rather than for git, semantic versioning, and documenting breaking changes so nobody is surprised. Trigger on "write release notes for v2.3", "update the changelog", "is this a major or minor version bump". Do not use for…
execute-phase
Step executor for units whose triage (unit-lane) decided which steps the unit needs. Implements one triaged step (or all remaining steps), with frozen acceptance, step-local gates, commits, red-gate repair, and diff-size guard. BREAKING: replaced PLAN.md/TASKS.md/progress.md/ACCEPTANCE.md with the unit doc's Tasks…
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".