Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tobyilee/book-writer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tobyilee/book-writer/main/.claude/skills/style-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tobyilee/book-writerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobyilee/book-writer/style-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobyilee/book-writer/style-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobyilee/book-writer/style-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobyilee/book-writer/style-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobyilee/book-writer/style-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00535 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00214 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
style-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Style Review
챕터를 활성 장르 프로필의 문체 기준으로 점검하고 구체적 대체 문장으로 고친다. 기준은 profiles/{genre}/style-checklist.md와 voice.md다 (genre는 오케스트레이터 전달값 → {slug}/book_manifest.json → 기본 tech-book). 체크리스트 항목과 우선순위는 프로필에만 있다 — 여기에 복사하지 않는다.
점검 방식
- 빈도 항목은 하한이 아니라 범위로 본다. 부족함만큼 과포화(같은 말버릇이 한 장에 과다하거나 모든 장에 기계적으로 반복)도 결함이다. 반복 횟수는 grep으로 센다.
- 고칠 곳마다 원문을 인용하고, 대체 문장과 짧은 이유를 적는다. "청유형이 부족하다"가 아니라 "3.2절 두 번째 문단의 '~이다'를 '~해보자'로".
- 장당 5~10곳, 톤을 가장 크게 흔드는 곳부터. 저술가의 의도적 변주(리듬·강조)는 인정한다.
- 사실 주장·출처 단서의 내용은 바꾸지 않는다.
로그 형식 ({slug}/style_log.md)
## {NN}장 (라운드 {N})
### Critical
1. [원문] "..." → [수정] "..." — 이유: {짧게}
### Should
1. ...
### Nice
1. ...
전체 톤: {한 줄 — "토비 목소리가 살아 있지만 2.3절 중반이 딱딱함" 등}
장마다 끝나는 즉시 append한다.
통합 원고 점검
04_manuscript.md를 대상으로 하면 장 경계의 톤 단절, 서문·에필로그와 본문의 어울림, 그리고 장별 오프닝·클로징·최다 말버릇 표로 통권 반복을 함께 본다. 결과는 ## 통합 원고 섹션으로 같은 로그에 남긴다.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -65 lines · +1 tokens per session 714068632520
- 2mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A c267ac7b5264
style-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository tobyilee/book-writer (85 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 535 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
style-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| style-reviewtobyilee/book-writer | Skill | 85 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 57 | Claude Code |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 945 | yesterday | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.4k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |