Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Today-Hbw/claude-code-dev-workflow --skill grillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Today-Hbw/claude-code-dev-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/today-hbw/claude-code-dev-workflow/grill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/today-hbw/claude-code-dev-workflow/grill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/today-hbw/claude-code-dev-workflow/grill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/today-hbw/claude-code-dev-workflow/grill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/today-hbw/claude-code-dev-workflow/grill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.01117 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00447 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00223 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
grill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
grill · 提问方法论
你的任务
针对 PRD 需求中模糊、缺失、有歧义的部分，沿着决策树逐条向用户提问，直到所有关键不确定点都对齐。
核心方法：决策树遍历
不要按维度平铺提问，而是把 PRD 看作一棵决策树：
PRD
├── 决策 A：数据存在哪？
│ ├── 决策 A1：用新表还是复用旧表？
│ └── 决策 A2：字段如何设计？
├── 决策 B：接口怎么暴露？
│ ├── 决策 B1：新增接口还是扩展现有接口？
│ └── 决策 B2：参数格式？
└── 决策 C：UI 如何呈现？
└── 决策 C1：字段顺序和默认值？
遍历规则：
- 先识别所有决策分支：读完 PRD 后，列出所有需要做出的决策
- 按依赖关系排序：先解决前置决策（被其他决策依赖的节点）
- 逐个向下走：每次只问一个问题，等用户回答后再问下一个
- 回答可能揭示新分支：用户的回答可能引出新的决策节点，动态加入树中
提问原则
-
先推荐，再确认：每个问题先给出你的推荐答案和理由，再让用户确认或修改
我的建议：用新表 `user_preferences` 存储，理由是... 你觉得这样可以吗？还是有其他考虑？ -
一次只问一个问题：并行抛出多个问题会让用户混乱。问完一个，等回答，再问下一个。
-
先查答案来源，再问用户：能查到答案的问题不要问用户。
- 视觉规格问题先回 PRD 内嵌截图/原型逐元素核对——图里已标注的按图定死。
- 实现问题先用 Glob/Grep/Read 查代码库，查到就直接用。
-
给出判断依据：推荐答案要说明为什么，不要只说"我建议 X"，要说"我建议 X，因为 Y"。
-
标记缺口：仅当 PRD 正文和截图/原型都未给出时才算真缺口——标为「缺口」、说明临时方案、继续推进。
提问维度（辅助参考）
决策树遍历是主方法，以下维度帮助你在遍历中发现遗漏的决策节点：
| 维度 | 典型决策点 |
|---|---|
| 边界条件 | 空值怎么处理？最大/最小值？超限怎么办？ |
| 依赖关系 | 依赖哪个表/接口/其他任务？先后顺序？ |
| 存储结构 | 数据存在哪？新表还是复用？字段设计？ |
| UI 细节 | 字段折进已有列还是独立列？按钮文案？入口挂哪个页签？筛选放哪？字段顺序？默认值？ |
| 异常处理 | 失败怎么提示？重试？回滚？ |
| 性能 | 数据量多大？需要分页？有并发问题？ |
| 兼容性 | 需要兼容旧版本吗？接口变更？ |
提问方式
使用 AskUserQuestion 工具：
问题：<具体决策问题>
选项 A：<你的推荐方案>（附理由）
选项 B：<备选方案 1>
选项 C：<备选方案 2>
提问流程
1. 读完 PRD 后，画出决策树（列出所有决策节点和依赖关系）
↓
2. 从根节点开始（最不依赖其他决策的节点）
↓
3. 每个节点：先推荐 → 问用户 → 记录回答
↓
4. 回答可能揭示新节点 → 动态加入决策树
↓
5. 所有节点遍历完毕 → 检查是否有遗漏维度
↓
完成 → 进入步骤 3（编码）
注意事项
- 如果用户说「你自己判断」，给出你的建议方案并记录，不反复追问
- 不要纠结于小问题，先确保大方向正确
- 如果需求已经足够清晰，可以快速过一遍确认，不需要强行提问
- 用户的回答可能推翻之前的理解，及时调整决策树
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 101 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 749ef9257e0a
grill is a skill published in the GitHub repository Today-Hbw/claude-code-dev-workflow (23 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,117 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
happiness-skill
A Chinese-language guide to happiness based on reducing unmet wants, focusing on the present, and treating happiness as a trainable skill.
setup-matt-pocock-skills
A setup skill that configures engineering skills for a repository, including its issue tracker, labels, and documentation layout. A repository is the project folder managed by version control.
aiwg-regenerate-copilot
Regenerate copilot-instructions.md for GitHub Copilot with vendor-specific content only.
config-validator
Validate AIWG configuration files and project setup for correctness and completeness.
link-check
Verify @file references in AIWG skills and agents against the linking contract — per-file or corpus-wide, with optional auto-fix.
checkpoint
Create, list, or recover mid-workflow checkpoints so interrupted work resumes from a known-good position.