Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tomcounsell/ai. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tomcounsell/ai/main/.claude/skills-global/de-slop/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomcounsell/aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomcounsell/ai/de-slop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomcounsell/ai/de-slop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomcounsell/ai/de-slop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomcounsell/ai/de-slop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomcounsell/ai/de-slop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.02929 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01465 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00586 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00293 |
Grade A, and why
de-slop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 149 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A c5f6955595c9
de-slop is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomcounsell/ai (24 stars, last pushed today), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 2,929 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa
Run scalable, isolated live QA for nac development. The top-level local orchestrator must parse n (default 4), dispatch one setup worker with this skill, copy its n assignment contracts verbatim into exactly n parallel test workers with this skill, then dispatch one aggregate worker with this skill using all test…
release
Cut and publish a full stable NAC release after main, release-PR, and publication CI pass. Use when a maintainer asks for a stable version bump, tag, or GitHub Release. Never use for release candidates; NAC RC releases are automated.
autonomous-loops
Patterns and architectures for autonomous loops — from simple sequential pipelines to RFC-driven multi-agent DAG systems. Use when setting up autonomous development workflows, choosing the right loop architecture, or building CI/CD-style continuous development pipelines.
context-engineering
Optimizes agent context setup. Use when starting a new session, when agent output quality degrades, when switching between tasks, or when you need to configure rules files and context for a project.
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production, security-sensitive logic, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now…
iterative-retrieval
Pattern for progressively refining context retrieval to solve the subagent context problem. Use when spawning subagents that need codebase context they cannot predict upfront, or when building multi-agent workflows where context is progressively refined.