Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tommymorgan/claude-plugins --skill verification-sweepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tommymorgan/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tommymorgan/claude-plugins/verification-sweep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tommymorgan/claude-plugins/verification-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tommymorgan/claude-plugins/verification-sweep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tommymorgan/claude-plugins/verification-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tommymorgan/claude-plugins/verification-sweep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01366 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00683 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
verification-sweep scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl http://localhost:3000/health How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 240 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verification Sweep
Algorithm for verifying task completion by running verification commands and updating plan status.
Purpose
Verification sweep establishes ground truth about task completion:
- Run verification commands to prove tasks are done
- Update plan file with accurate statuses
- Detect regressions in previously complete tasks
- Report what work remains
When to Use
Perform verification sweep:
- At the start of
/tommymorgan:work(before doing any work) - When running
/tommymorgan:status - After returning from a break or new session
- Before reporting completion status
Algorithm
Step 1: Load Plan File
Read the plan file and extract all tasks:
For each line matching "### \d+\. ":
- task_number = extracted number
- task_description = text after number
- verify_command = content of next **Verify**: `...`
- current_status = value after **Status**:
Step 2: Run Verification Commands
For each task, execute its verification command:
<verify_command>
echo "Exit code: $?"
Capture:
- Exit code (0 = success)
- Stdout/stderr (for debugging)
Step 3: Determine New Status
Apply status transition rules:
| Current Status | Exit Code | New Status | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| pending | 0 | complete | Update plan |
| pending | non-zero | pending | No change |
| complete | 0 | complete | No change |
| complete | non-zero | complete | Warn: regression |
| blocked | 0 | complete | Update plan, clear block |
| blocked | non-zero | blocked | No change |
Regression handling: If a previously complete task now fails, warn but do not change status:
WARNING: Regression detected in task N: <description>
Verification command failed but task marked complete.
Investigate before continuing.
Step 4: Update Plan File
For each status change, update the plan file:
Find:
**Status**: pending
Replace with:
**Status**: complete
Use precise edits - only change the status value, preserve everything else.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 240 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 824099be26cf
verification-sweep is a skill published in the GitHub repository tommymorgan/claude-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,366 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.