review-guards

review-guards is a skill for Claude Code from tomsej/pi-ext. It costs 79 tokens per session (1,406 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A way to turn project review rules into automatic checks and written reviewer guidance. Structural rules use ast-grep, a tool that matches code patterns; qualitative rules go in REVIEWGUIDELINES.md.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to enforce rules such as requiring authentication middleware, banning console.log in certain places, or preventing raw SQL in controllers, with tests for each rule.
Why use it?
It prevents repeated review findings from depending on someone remembering to check them manually.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to enforce rules such as requiring authentication middleware, banning console.log in certain places, or preventing raw SQL in controllers, with tests for each rule.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guards
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add tomsej/pi-ext --skill review-guards
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomsej/pi-ext

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-guards

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guards/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guards)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guards/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-guards

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guards.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 79 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,406 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00079 $0.01406
Opus 5.5 $0.00032 $0.00562
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00281
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00141

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 3fc608de6e89, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-guards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/review-guards/SKILL.md · 113 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/review-guards — turn review rules into guards

Goal: a review rule stated once should never depend on a reviewer's memory again. Mechanical rules become ast-grep guards (exit code decides); everything else becomes written guidance reviewers receive automatically.

1. Triage each rule

Rule kind Destination
Structural / mechanical ("no console.log outside logger", "every handler calls auth middleware", "no raw SQL in controllers") ast-grep rule
Type-aware or flow-sensitive existing linter / tsc config — do NOT emulate a type checker with patterns
Qualitative (naming taste, architecture judgement) REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md in repo root — the /review extension and review subagents pick it up

If a rule can't name a concrete AST shape, it is not an ast-grep rule.

2. Project setup (once)

sgconfig.yml          # ruleDirs: [.ast-grep/rules], testConfigs: [{testDir: .ast-grep/tests}]
.ast-grep/rules/      # one YAML per rule
.ast-grep/tests/      # one test per rule: valid + invalid snippets

Requires ast-grep on PATH (brew package, already in chezmoi packages).

3. Write each rule TDD-style

  1. Write the test FIRST: .ast-grep/tests/<id>-test.yml with valid: (must not match) and invalid: (must match) snippets — the invalid one is the exact code from the review finding that motivated the rule.
  2. Write .ast-grep/rules/<id>.yml: id, language, severity: error, message (say WHY, not just what), rule: (pattern/kind/inside…).
  3. ast-grep test --skip-snapshot-tests — must print Running N tests with your test INCLUDED and pass. Pitfall: a test whose rule id does not exist is silently skipped (0 passed, exit 0) — the count is the proof the test ran. A wrong rule fails loudly (non-zero exit). Optionally pin snapshots with ast-grep test -U and drop the flag afterwards.
  4. ast-grep scan on the repo: every existing hit is either fixed now or the rule's scope is narrowed — never ship a guard the codebase already violates.

Read the full file on GitHub · 113 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 113 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 3fc608de6e89

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-guards is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomsej/pi-ext (79 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 1,406 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

adk-go-self-review

Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…

google/adk-go · 87 tokens

adversarial-reviewer

Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…

emdash-cms/emdash · 72 tokens

go-testing

Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 26 tokens

semgrep-rule-variant-creator

Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.

waybarrios/opencode-power-pack · 50 tokens

brooks-sweep

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 178 tokens

plugin-review

Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.

athola/claude-night-market · 23 tokens