Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guardsnpx skills add tomsej/pi-ext --skill review-guardsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomsej/pi-extWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guards)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/review-guards.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.01406 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00703 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00281 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
review-guards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/review-guards — turn review rules into guards
Goal: a review rule stated once should never depend on a reviewer's memory again. Mechanical rules become ast-grep guards (exit code decides); everything else becomes written guidance reviewers receive automatically.
1. Triage each rule
| Rule kind | Destination |
|---|---|
Structural / mechanical ("no console.log outside logger", "every handler calls auth middleware", "no raw SQL in controllers") |
ast-grep rule |
| Type-aware or flow-sensitive | existing linter / tsc config — do NOT emulate a type checker with patterns |
| Qualitative (naming taste, architecture judgement) | REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md in repo root — the /review extension and review subagents pick it up |
If a rule can't name a concrete AST shape, it is not an ast-grep rule.
2. Project setup (once)
sgconfig.yml # ruleDirs: [.ast-grep/rules], testConfigs: [{testDir: .ast-grep/tests}]
.ast-grep/rules/ # one YAML per rule
.ast-grep/tests/ # one test per rule: valid + invalid snippets
Requires ast-grep on PATH (brew package, already in chezmoi packages).
3. Write each rule TDD-style
- Write the test FIRST:
.ast-grep/tests/<id>-test.ymlwithvalid:(must not match) andinvalid:(must match) snippets — the invalid one is the exact code from the review finding that motivated the rule. - Write
.ast-grep/rules/<id>.yml:id,language,severity: error,message(say WHY, not just what),rule:(pattern/kind/inside…). ast-grep test --skip-snapshot-tests— must printRunning N testswith your test INCLUDED and pass. Pitfall: a test whose rule id does not exist is silently skipped (0 passed, exit 0) — the count is the proof the test ran. A wrong rule fails loudly (non-zero exit). Optionally pin snapshots withast-grep test -Uand drop the flag afterwards.ast-grep scanon the repo: every existing hit is either fixed now or the rule's scope is narrowed — never ship a guard the codebase already violates.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 113 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 3fc608de6e89
review-guards is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomsej/pi-ext (70 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 1,406 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…