Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tomzx/agents --skill handle-pr-reviewer-feedbackgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/handle-pr-reviewer-feedback)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/handle-pr-reviewer-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/handle-pr-reviewer-feedback/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/handle-pr-reviewer-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/handle-pr-reviewer-feedback.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.01138 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00569 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
handle-pr-reviewer-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Handle PR Reviewer Feedback
Reviews and responds to all reviewer comments on a GitHub pull request you authored, implementing valid feedback or explaining rejections with clear justification. On user approval it commits and pushes changes; whether replies are posted to GitHub is decided by should-post-to-github (based on ~/.sdlc/config.yaml), otherwise replies are drafted without posting.
For the reviewer-side flow (verifying that a PR author addressed your review comments), use handle-pr-author-feedback instead.
Prerequisites
- Apply the shared SDLC conventions in
skills/sdlc/references/shared.md. - If no argument is provided, target the pull request from
$PR_NUMBER(and$REPO). ghCLI authenticated with write access to the target repository- PR number identifying an open pull request with at least one review comment
- If
$1is provided, use it directly - If
$1is not provided, resolve the PR number with:gh pr list --head $(git branch --show-current) --json number --jq '.[0].number'
- If
Skill attribution (GitHub)
Before posting any PR comment with gh, read github-post-attribution/SKILL.md and append the Posted with footer for SKILL_DIR = handle-pr-reviewer-feedback.
Workflow
Fetch PR comments ($1)
|
v
For each comment
|
v
Evaluate: actionable or not?
|
v
Present outcome to user for approval
/ \
Approved Rejected
| |
v v
Implement Skip
changes
|
v
Commit + push
(always on approval)
|
v
Reply to each comment thread
with outcome (ghx), only if
should-post-to-github allows
Steps
- Fetch all PR review threads:
ghx pr threads $1 --ids - For each comment, evaluate whether it is appropriate and actionable.
- Present the evaluation and proposed action (implement or reject with explanation) to the user for approval.
- For actionable comments that the user approved: implement the requested changes in the codebase.
- Commit and push the changes (push is not gated):
git add -A && git commit -m "<message>" git push - Decide whether to post replies: get the PR author (
gh pr view $1 --repo <owner>/<repo> --json author --jq .author.login), then run~/.agents/scripts/should-post-to-github --repo "<owner>/<repo>" --author "<PR_AUTHOR>". If it exits 0, reply to each comment thread with the outcome usingghx. For actionable comments where changes were implemented: reply with a brief summary and a link to the commit (e.g., "Done: added null guard foruserin abc1234."). For non-actionable comments: reply with the rejection explanation. Use the thread IDs from step 1:
Append the Skill attribution footer to each reply. If the script exits 1, present the drafted replies to the user without posting.ghx pr comment $1 --reply-thread <thread-id> --body "<outcome summary>"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 108 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A eb70d415c8e9
handle-pr-reviewer-feedback is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,138 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
pr-pending-feedback
Evaluate pending (unsubmitted) review comments on the current branch's PR and, after user confirmation, address each in a separate sub-agent and separate commit.