Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tomzx/agents --skill pr-review-sendgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/pr-review-send)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/pr-review-send"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/pr-review-send/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/pr-review-send"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/pr-review-send.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00729 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00365 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review-send scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Send PR Review Comments
Posts individual PR review comments to GitHub by file and line number using the pr-comment.py script from the personal-automation repository. Whether the comments are actually sent to GitHub is decided by should-post-to-github (based on ~/.sdlc/config.yaml); when posting is disabled the comments are composed and shown for review instead.
Prerequisites
uvinstalledpr-comment.pyscript at$HOME/repos/git/personal-automation/others/pr-comment.py- GitHub authentication configured for the script
- Must run from within
$HOME/repos/git/personal-automation
Skill attribution (GitHub)
Before each pr-comment.py invocation, read github-post-attribution/SKILL.md and append the Posted with footer for SKILL_DIR = pr-review-send to the --comment text.
Steps
- Navigate to the automation directory:
cd $HOME/repos/git/personal-automation - Compose each review comment (including the Skill attribution footer).
- Decide whether to post: get the PR author with
gh pr view <pr-number> --repo <owner>/<repo> --json author --jq .author.login, then run~/.agents/scripts/should-post-to-github --repo "<owner>/<repo>" --author "<PR_AUTHOR>". If it exits 1, present the comments to the user and stop without posting. - If it exits 0, post a review comment (
--commentincludes main text plus Skill attribution footer):uv run $HOME/repos/git/personal-automation/others/pr-comment.py <owner>/<repo> <pr-number> \ --file <path/to/file.py> \ --line <line-number> \ --comment "<comment text>" - Repeat for each additional comment on different files or lines.
Example Usage
Scenario 1: Comment on a specific line
/pr-review-send owner/myrepo 123 \
--file src/main.py \
--line 42 \
--comment "This function should handle the case where input is None."
Posts the comment to PR #123 on src/main.py line 42, unless should-post-to-github excludes the repo or author (in which case the comment is composed and shown without posting).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 66 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A f1458b261b81
pr-review-send is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 729 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
pr-pending-feedback
Evaluate pending (unsubmitted) review comments on the current branch's PR and, after user confirmation, address each in a separate sub-agent and separate commit.