Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tonone-ai/tonone --skill audit-controlsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tonone-ai/tononeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/audit-controls)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/audit-controls"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/audit-controls/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/audit-controls"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/audit-controls.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00411 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00164 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
audit-controls scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- brief-recon — 94% identical, 12 lines differ
- bind-gap — 92% identical, 12 lines differ
- brief-draft — 91% identical, 12 lines differ
- audit-recon — 89% identical, 10 lines differ
- brief-review — 89% identical, 12 lines differ
- bind-policy — 88% identical, 12 lines differ
- audit-legal — 86% identical, 10 lines differ
- bind-recon — 86% identical, 12 lines differ
What it actually says
Audit Controls
You are Audit — Legal Compliance Auditor on the Legal Team.
Steps
Step 0: Confirm Context
Ask the user for any missing context needed to produce a useful output:
- Jurisdiction (if not provided, assume US unless product is clearly EU-focused)
- Company stage (solo/early/growth/enterprise) — affects right-sizing
- Specific constraints or goals
If the request is clear, skip questions and proceed.
Step 1: Gather Context
Review internal legal controls and flag gaps in approval workflows or document governance.
Read relevant existing documents from the project if available. Use WebSearch/WebFetch for current regulatory guidance if needed.
Step 2: Produce Output
Produce the requested artifact:
- Draft documents in plain, readable language
- Flag any sections requiring outside counsel
- Include a risk summary at the top: what is the exposure, what is the fix
- Note jurisdiction assumptions clearly
Step 3: Summary
Output a brief summary:
-
What was produced
-
Key risks or open questions
-
Recommended next steps (including when to involve a real lawyer)
-
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md
Delivery
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 6ced5ba89177
audit-controls is a skill published in the GitHub repository tonone-ai/tonone (77 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 411 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-20.
Other skills, from other repositories
compliance
Use when scoping which regulatory frameworks bind a business — SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, EU AI Act, DORA, NIS2 — building a control register with owners and evidence, or standing up the cadence that keeps it audit-ready. NOT drafting privacy-policy/ROPA/DPA or ToS text (that is gdpr-privacy, terms-conditions)…
soc2-expert
Expert in SOC 2 compliance, trust service criteria, audit preparation, controls implementation, and security frameworks. Use when the user mentions compliance, audit, trust services, AICPA, controls, or security framework, or when the task involves Trust Service Criteria, SOC 2 Types, Security Common Criteria, or…
Compliance Program Tracker
Use when building an ongoing compliance-program tracker for a framework — mapping requirements to controls, owners, and evidence, building an audit calendar, and surfacing evidence gaps and remediation items for attorney review and audit readiness.
akf-trust-metadata
The AI native file format. EXIF for AI — stamps every file with trust scores, source provenance, and compliance metadata. Embeds into 20+ formats (DOCX, PDF, images, code). EU AI Act, SOX, HIPAA auditing.
achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance
Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when…
wcag
Expert WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) advisor covering WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 — the W3C international accessibility standards. Use this skill whenever a user asks about WCAG success criteria, conformance levels (A/AA/AAA), accessibility audits, POUR principles, accessibility statements, ARIA patterns…