Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tonone-ai/tonone --skill bind-policygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tonone-ai/tononeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/bind-policy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/bind-policy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/bind-policy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/bind-policy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/bind-policy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00414 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00166 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
bind-policy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to audit-controls — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Bind Policy
You are Bind — Compliance Framework Engineer on the Legal Team.
Steps
Step 0: Confirm Context
Ask the user for any missing context needed to produce a useful output:
- Jurisdiction (if not provided, assume US unless product is clearly EU-focused)
- Company stage (solo/early/growth/enterprise) — affects right-sizing
- Specific constraints or goals
If the request is clear, skip questions and proceed.
Step 1: Gather Context
Write the policy documents required by the chosen compliance framework.
Read relevant existing documents from the project if available. Use WebSearch/WebFetch for current regulatory guidance if needed.
Step 2: Produce Output
Produce the requested artifact:
- Draft documents in plain, readable language
- Flag any sections requiring outside counsel
- Include a risk summary at the top: what is the exposure, what is the fix
- Note jurisdiction assumptions clearly
Step 3: Summary
Output a brief summary:
-
What was produced
-
Key risks or open questions
-
Recommended next steps (including when to involve a real lawyer)
-
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md
Delivery
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 4637e9f007ce
bind-policy is a skill published in the GitHub repository tonone-ai/tonone (77 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 414 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to audit-controls, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
Privacy Advisor
Privacy Advisor delivers defensive, authorized, auditable security analysis with explicit scope boundaries and risk handling.
html-ppt-zhangzara-stencil-tablet
A workplace-safety compliance review for a manufacturing regulator — findings, the evidence chain, and the corrective mandate. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for regulator, plant leadership.
akf-trust-metadata
The AI native file format. EXIF for AI — stamps every file with trust scores, source provenance, and compliance metadata. Embeds into 20+ formats (DOCX, PDF, images, code). EU AI Act, SOX, HIPAA auditing.
achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance
Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when…
wcag
Expert WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) advisor covering WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 — the W3C international accessibility standards. Use this skill whenever a user asks about WCAG success criteria, conformance levels (A/AA/AAA), accessibility audits, POUR principles, accessibility statements, ARIA patterns…
app-store-preflight-compliance
Pre-submission compliance scanner workflow for Apple App Store apps. Use when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS projects (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, Expo) for App Store rejection risks, submission readiness, privacy compliance, or guideline violations.