Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Tradebaas/Groundwork --skill debuggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Tradebaas/GroundworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tradebaas/groundwork/debug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tradebaas/groundwork/debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tradebaas/groundwork/debug/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tradebaas/groundwork/debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tradebaas/groundwork/debug.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00754 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00302 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
debug: from symptom to proven root cause
A fix you never saw fail is a guess (verify). This loop turns an unknown failure into a
proven fix at the lowest cost. Production incident? Stabilize first per maintain (rollback
beats diagnosis under fire), then run this loop calmly.
The loop
- Read the actual error. The message, the stack, the failing line. Capture expected vs actual behavior verbatim before touching anything: the error usually says more than the first theory about it.
- Reproduce before fixing. A failing automated test at the nearest seam is the goal; a minimal script is the fallback. Shrink the repro until removing anything makes the bug disappear. What you cannot reproduce you cannot fix, only disturb.
- Check what changed. Most bugs live in the newest diff: recent commits, dependency
bumps, config or environment changes.
git bisectbeats rereading the whole system. - Hypothesize, test one change at a time. Rank hypotheses by likelihood and cost of testing; each experiment changes exactly one thing and names its predicted outcome before running. Two simultaneous changes make the result unreadable. Read the evidence at arm's length: a failing suite or a log enters the context as its failures and counts (tail, grep, or a subagent), never whole, or the third experiment runs in a context the first two filled. Expect horses, not zebras: the common cause outranks the exotic one until evidence says otherwise.
- Fix the root cause, once. The fix goes where the cause lives, not where the symptom
showed (decision ladder in
docs/standards/GLOBAL.md: understand, then fix the cause once). A symptom patch that leaves the cause in place is not progress, and per debug hygiene a change that demonstrably fixed nothing gets reverted, not left in. - Prove and clean. The repro test passes and stays as the regression test; every debug shim (prints, sleeps, forced branches, commented-out calls) is removed; the full gate chain runs green.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed d63eaf9dcf99
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines ba6c1121ce98
- 1mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b688bc746995
debug is a skill published in the GitHub repository Tradebaas/Groundwork (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 754 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing
Skill validation framework PLUS daily test-suite health and regression intelligence. Validates skill conformance (frontmatter, manifest coverage, resolver coverage). Runs the project test suite in tiered phases (unit / evals / integration / system health), classifies failures, and produces a regression-aware report.
verify
Verify that a change really works before you claim completion.
detect-static-dependencies
ACTIVATION PREREQUISITE: the request or discovered target must explicitly identify C#, .NET, .cs, or .csproj; otherwise stay dormant without invoking this skill. USE FOR: locating System.DateTime.Now/UtcNow, System.IO.File/Directory, System.Environment, HttpClient, Console, or Process usage in C#; auditing C# code for…
dart-downstream-fix
DART Downstream Fix: fix a DART bug reported through gz-physics or Gazebo.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
experiment-iterative-coder
Iterative code refinement through plan → code → evaluate → refine cycles. Runs lint checks (ruff), tests (pytest), and structured self-evaluation each cycle, then diagnoses failures and refines. Decomposes complex tasks into sequential phases, iterates up to 3 times per phase (10 total). Use when: the main agent…