Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add transparent-pegasus/herdrpowers --skill using-git-worktreesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/transparent-pegasus/herdrpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/transparent-pegasus/herdrpowers/using-git-worktrees)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/transparent-pegasus/herdrpowers/using-git-worktrees"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/transparent-pegasus/herdrpowers/using-git-worktrees/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/transparent-pegasus/herdrpowers/using-git-worktrees"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/transparent-pegasus/herdrpowers/using-git-worktrees.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 47 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 69 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.02594 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.01038 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00519 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00259 |
Grade A, and why
using-git-worktrees scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 213 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Using Git Worktrees
Overview
Ensure work happens in an isolated workspace under the repository's shared worktree directory. Prefer native worktree tools that can use that directory; otherwise use git worktrees.
Core principle: Detect existing isolation first. Resolve one shared directory for all agents, then choose a tool that honors it.
Announce at start: "I'm using the using-git-worktrees skill to set up an isolated workspace."
Step 0: Detect Existing Isolation
Before creating anything, check if you are already in an isolated workspace.
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
Submodule guard: GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON is also true inside git submodules. Before concluding "already in a worktree," verify you are not in a submodule:
# If this returns a path, you're in a submodule, not a worktree — treat as normal repo
git rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree 2>/dev/null
If GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON (and not a submodule): You are already in a linked worktree. Skip to Step 2 (Project Setup). Do NOT create another worktree.
Report with branch state:
- On a branch: "Already in isolated workspace at
<path>on branch<name>." - Detached HEAD: "Already in isolated workspace at
<path>(detached HEAD, externally managed). Branch creation needed at finish time."
If this task's design doc or plan sits untracked in the primary checkout, carry it over now (Step 1c).
If GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (or in a submodule): You are in a normal repo checkout.
Has the user already indicated their worktree preference in your instructions? If not, ask for consent before creating a worktree:
"Would you like me to set up an isolated worktree? It protects your current branch from changes."
Honor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines consent, work in place and skip to Step 2.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · -2 lines ecb7267f7514
- 2mo ago First seen · 215 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A cf176f263699
using-git-worktrees is a skill published in the GitHub repository transparent-pegasus/herdrpowers (14 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 2,594 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
using-git-worktrees compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| using-git-worktreestransparent-pegasus/herdrpowers | Skill | 14 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| git-workflowericrisco/rsc-harness | Skill | 503 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 127 | Claude Code, Codex |
| worktree-isolationInsajin/autopus-adk | Skill | 111 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code, Codex |
| git-worktreesInsajin/autopus-adk | Skill | 111 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code, Codex |
| lore-commitInsajin/autopus-adk | Skill | 111 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code, Codex |
| hash-anchored-editInsajin/autopus-adk | Skill | 111 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code, Codex |
| synthetic-release-notestheinfosecguy/razin | Skill | 16 | 13d ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code, Codex |